![]() | A fact from Above Znoneofthe appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 8 November 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk)
18:25, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Created by Ivanvector ( talk). Self-nominated, as alt account PEIsquirrel ( talk), at 13:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC).
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
@
PEIsquirrel: Hi, welcome to DYK! This nomination will need a bit of work before it's ready to be on the front page, but this is good so far! It's very amusing.
theleekycauldron (
talk •
contribs) (
they/them)
18:46, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Can someone justify the relevance of this wiki bio? I'm considering removing the page.
From what I gathered from reading this, this guy is a joke candidate that has never earned more than one percent of the vote during the election. As a general policy in Canadian elections, we don't create bios for unsuccessful candidates, even when they are part of major political parties. FluffyCanada ( talk) 16:17, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
@ FluffyCanada: I've removed the PROD, and seeing the discussion here, an AfD would be more appropriate if you want to pursue it, as it is a bit more contentious than expected. I'd err on the side that he is notable, having had profiles of him made by Time and CTV (that satisfying GNG with multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject, and non-trivial coverage). ~~ Ebe 123~~ → report 17:56, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() | A fact from Above Znoneofthe appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 8 November 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk)
18:25, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Created by Ivanvector ( talk). Self-nominated, as alt account PEIsquirrel ( talk), at 13:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC).
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
@
PEIsquirrel: Hi, welcome to DYK! This nomination will need a bit of work before it's ready to be on the front page, but this is good so far! It's very amusing.
theleekycauldron (
talk •
contribs) (
they/them)
18:46, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Can someone justify the relevance of this wiki bio? I'm considering removing the page.
From what I gathered from reading this, this guy is a joke candidate that has never earned more than one percent of the vote during the election. As a general policy in Canadian elections, we don't create bios for unsuccessful candidates, even when they are part of major political parties. FluffyCanada ( talk) 16:17, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
@ FluffyCanada: I've removed the PROD, and seeing the discussion here, an AfD would be more appropriate if you want to pursue it, as it is a bit more contentious than expected. I'd err on the side that he is notable, having had profiles of him made by Time and CTV (that satisfying GNG with multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject, and non-trivial coverage). ~~ Ebe 123~~ → report 17:56, 4 December 2022 (UTC)