This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Aberfan Disaster Tribunal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The original text of this page was copied from this version of Aberfan disaster. Its attribution history may be found at that page. Verbcatcher ( talk) 21:06, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
We should expand the findings and recommendations of the report. We omit several of the points in The Times report on the day after the report was published:
Specifically these sub-articles:
In addition to covering Robens resignation offer, the following article covers the repercussions on the officials named in the report:
In fact, of the nine officials named, only two remained in the posts they then occupied. Two had left the board's service and five others were in other posts with the board's organization. The remaining two, the colliery manager, [named], and the unit engineer, [named], should be transferred to other jobs in the industry.
We should cover the support for Robens after the tribunal report, particularly from the mining unions, based on these sources:
I may eventually get around to adding these myself, but I wanted to post the references here for others. Verbcatcher ( talk) 00:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Aberfan Disaster Tribunal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The original text of this page was copied from this version of Aberfan disaster. Its attribution history may be found at that page. Verbcatcher ( talk) 21:06, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
We should expand the findings and recommendations of the report. We omit several of the points in The Times report on the day after the report was published:
Specifically these sub-articles:
In addition to covering Robens resignation offer, the following article covers the repercussions on the officials named in the report:
In fact, of the nine officials named, only two remained in the posts they then occupied. Two had left the board's service and five others were in other posts with the board's organization. The remaining two, the colliery manager, [named], and the unit engineer, [named], should be transferred to other jobs in the industry.
We should cover the support for Robens after the tribunal report, particularly from the mining unions, based on these sources:
I may eventually get around to adding these myself, but I wanted to post the references here for others. Verbcatcher ( talk) 00:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)