This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Scotland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Excellent idea to classify entries under generic headings. Fully support this. Initial concern is over the access to such entries - does this classification introduce a layer of complexity for referring/ searching ? Can this classification operate within the normal/ usual editing practices - inc. the use of media? I really don't want to learning more about wikitext :-) More interesting in providing content. Ray Oaks ( talk) 09:18, 13 March 2014 (UTC) reply