 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been largely prepared from the official history, which ended in 1896, and Horne's history, published in 1947. The post-war history is therefore bare, saving only for the Bank's merger in 1983. There is a history published in 1967, Aberdeen Savings Bank: Its History from 1815 to 1965, but this has not been accessed.
Bebington ( talk) 12:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
This is a good article, but I think it needs a bit of copyediting. Happy to discuss further. Pyrrho the Skeptic ( talk) 14:47, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your courtesy in asking first. I am always open to suggestions though I do find that alterations are often a personal opinion on style rather than mistakes, Bebington ( talk) 10:33, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- The article is mostly fine, but there are sentences that should be rewritten in a more encyclopedic style:
- The Savings Bank’s modest start
- The reconstruction did create one anomaly that took half a century to correct.
- The old trustees even started to charge rent to the Bank
- These read like an internal history, not an uninvolved third party. I will correct as best I can.
Pyrrho the Skeptic ( talk) 17:33, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
I must admit that when I saw your comment that the article could do with “a bit of copyediting”, I was apprehensive about what I would find. In the event, there were three instances and I could not see any substantive reason to change. I have been copyedited many times, including by academic publishers, and they tend to concentrate only on obvious errors. I could have written the relevant sentences many different ways, and so could you. I think it is best to leave it as it is. Bebington ( talk) 10:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- I may make a few copyedits. Feel free to revert. Please remember that no one "owns" Wikipedia articles and edits don't have to get any particular editors approval. I was trying to be polite. Pyrrho the Skeptic ( talk) 16:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
I do know you ere being polite - I had thanked you for your courtesy. Bebington ( talk) 16:47, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been largely prepared from the official history, which ended in 1896, and Horne's history, published in 1947. The post-war history is therefore bare, saving only for the Bank's merger in 1983. There is a history published in 1967, Aberdeen Savings Bank: Its History from 1815 to 1965, but this has not been accessed.
Bebington ( talk) 12:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
This is a good article, but I think it needs a bit of copyediting. Happy to discuss further. Pyrrho the Skeptic ( talk) 14:47, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your courtesy in asking first. I am always open to suggestions though I do find that alterations are often a personal opinion on style rather than mistakes, Bebington ( talk) 10:33, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- The article is mostly fine, but there are sentences that should be rewritten in a more encyclopedic style:
- The Savings Bank’s modest start
- The reconstruction did create one anomaly that took half a century to correct.
- The old trustees even started to charge rent to the Bank
- These read like an internal history, not an uninvolved third party. I will correct as best I can.
Pyrrho the Skeptic ( talk) 17:33, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
I must admit that when I saw your comment that the article could do with “a bit of copyediting”, I was apprehensive about what I would find. In the event, there were three instances and I could not see any substantive reason to change. I have been copyedited many times, including by academic publishers, and they tend to concentrate only on obvious errors. I could have written the relevant sentences many different ways, and so could you. I think it is best to leave it as it is. Bebington ( talk) 10:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- I may make a few copyedits. Feel free to revert. Please remember that no one "owns" Wikipedia articles and edits don't have to get any particular editors approval. I was trying to be polite. Pyrrho the Skeptic ( talk) 16:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
I do know you ere being polite - I had thanked you for your courtesy. Bebington ( talk) 16:47, 3 September 2021 (UTC)