Aberdeen F.C.–Rangers F.C. rivalry has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 7, 2018. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Aberdeen F.C.–Rangers F.C. rivalry appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 9 March 2018 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I have removed the 'insufficient inline citations' and 'possibly contains original research' flags for now.
When the article was created and assessed seven months ago, it already had 62 inline citations, some referred to several times as appropriate for the words being used. By now it has double that amount (137). If assessors feel certain citations should be more clearly outlined, i.e include a direct quote within the ref, I'll be happy to try and address this, but have decided not to do individually in place of the various multi-cited references on the off-chance that someone might object. If you find a particular issue, please fix it or ask me to do so.
Similarly, if original research is believed to be present at certain points in the text, offending passages can be flagged up and will be better cited or explained, or removed altogether if it can't be resolved. But really it is up to the reader to highlight this specifically, at this point I believe I have demonstrated sufficiently an effort to properly source any potentially contentious or dubious content across the article, plus all the easier-to-prove stuff like stats. Crowsus ( talk) 20:34, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Royroydeb ( talk · contribs) 09:12, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi I will be reviewing this article and will post my comments soon.
RRD (
talk)
09:12, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 17:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 09:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 07:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 16:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Added a note above the table explaining this. Crowsus ( talk) 18:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
*The first part of the Background section needs to be sourced separately instead of general citations at the end.Really not sure what you are meaning here sorry?
Crowsus (
talk)
13:28, 24 January 2018 (UTC) 13:28, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 17:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 09:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 07:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC) added some new refs from the season expressing the status of the rivalry. Changed fresh to renewed as its much the same as 25 years previously Crowsus ( talk) 11:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 16:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 17:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 09:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
WP:CRYSTALBALL; there seems to be some speculation about future. RRD ( talk) 07:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Yeah fair enough, it probably will be the case for the foreseeable future but can't be guaranteed, changed will be to has been to reflect the past rivalry instead.. Crowsus ( talk) 11:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
The article is appropriately illustrated with fair images. Since all the problems have been fixed, I am currently passing the article. RRD ( talk) 07:20, 7 February 2018 (UTC) Thanks very much, really appreciate the effort you put into the process. Crowsus ( talk) 09:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
I have removed the 'ead too short' hatnote as I have doubled the size of the intro since the time of it being added (see this edit for comparison), if more is considered needed please advise on what this should contain. Thanks. Crowsus ( talk) 02:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
When is the modern era that is referred to? Since the formation of the SFL's Premier Division? Red Jay ( talk) 18:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Aberdeen F.C.–Rangers F.C. rivalry has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 7, 2018. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Aberdeen F.C.–Rangers F.C. rivalry appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 9 March 2018 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I have removed the 'insufficient inline citations' and 'possibly contains original research' flags for now.
When the article was created and assessed seven months ago, it already had 62 inline citations, some referred to several times as appropriate for the words being used. By now it has double that amount (137). If assessors feel certain citations should be more clearly outlined, i.e include a direct quote within the ref, I'll be happy to try and address this, but have decided not to do individually in place of the various multi-cited references on the off-chance that someone might object. If you find a particular issue, please fix it or ask me to do so.
Similarly, if original research is believed to be present at certain points in the text, offending passages can be flagged up and will be better cited or explained, or removed altogether if it can't be resolved. But really it is up to the reader to highlight this specifically, at this point I believe I have demonstrated sufficiently an effort to properly source any potentially contentious or dubious content across the article, plus all the easier-to-prove stuff like stats. Crowsus ( talk) 20:34, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Royroydeb ( talk · contribs) 09:12, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi I will be reviewing this article and will post my comments soon.
RRD (
talk)
09:12, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 17:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 09:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 07:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 16:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Added a note above the table explaining this. Crowsus ( talk) 18:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
*The first part of the Background section needs to be sourced separately instead of general citations at the end.Really not sure what you are meaning here sorry?
Crowsus (
talk)
13:28, 24 January 2018 (UTC) 13:28, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 17:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 09:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 07:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC) added some new refs from the season expressing the status of the rivalry. Changed fresh to renewed as its much the same as 25 years previously Crowsus ( talk) 11:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 16:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 17:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
RRD ( talk) 09:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
WP:CRYSTALBALL; there seems to be some speculation about future. RRD ( talk) 07:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Yeah fair enough, it probably will be the case for the foreseeable future but can't be guaranteed, changed will be to has been to reflect the past rivalry instead.. Crowsus ( talk) 11:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
The article is appropriately illustrated with fair images. Since all the problems have been fixed, I am currently passing the article. RRD ( talk) 07:20, 7 February 2018 (UTC) Thanks very much, really appreciate the effort you put into the process. Crowsus ( talk) 09:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
I have removed the 'ead too short' hatnote as I have doubled the size of the intro since the time of it being added (see this edit for comparison), if more is considered needed please advise on what this should contain. Thanks. Crowsus ( talk) 02:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
When is the modern era that is referred to? Since the formation of the SFL's Premier Division? Red Jay ( talk) 18:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)