This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi! Sorry, I may not be available on wikipedia for few days, I am messaging here after my edits (linked in heading) on Aangan (TV series) page have been reverted by an anonymous; probably the creater of page.
|work=The Express Tribune
than do not write |title=XYZ - The Express Tribune
; it is useless repetition.|work=
, I have linked
The Express Tribune,
DAWN Images and
The News. The News may have been piped wrongly but it worths only in Pakistani articles, as not to overlink in other references in same page.[[Sonya Hussain|Soniya]]
; this is totally useless per
WP:NOPIPE.When my edits were reverted, the reply I got was, "Please please I beg you don't revert it." OK, then let me explain what's in MOS:TV, and why I think my edits should be brought back. Per Template:Infobox television:
|starring=
section, there should only be names of leading cast; like for here;
Ahsan Khan and
Mawra Hocane as said by the sources given.
|picture_format=
section, "Do not use "SDTV" as it is ambiguous."
|distributor=
Hum Network Limited
and |network=
Hum TV
; both are separate parameters and should be used correctly.|released=
is for episode or television special. For television series, use only |first_aired=<!--{{Start date|df=y|2018|4|}}-->
and |last_aired=<!--{{End date|df=y|||}}-->
parameters. Don't write April 2018 manually.|native_name={{Infobox name module|ur|{{Nq|آنگن}}}}
, so use it.However, only the following templates that I added are brought back in the page:
{{otheruses|Aangan (disambiguation)}} {{Use dmy dates|date=November 2017}} {{Use Pakistani English|date=November 2017}}
" I think you should familiarize yourself with WP:MOSTV before editing such articles." Please reply, Thanks! M. Billoo 03:56, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi KGirlTrucker81! I request you to please review the page once again. Please check the difference between the time you reviewed, and then the look it has right now. Which is acceptable, was I trying to destroy the article in view of MOS:TV? Also, please check User:M.Billoo2000/sandbox/Aangan (Hum TV) and let me know iff you found something unsourced or wrong, and compare it with this page. Am I trying to do it right or not? Please check this talk page also, and let me know your comments. Thanks! M. Billoo 20:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
For WP:C-P, see [1] and my sandbox doesn't violate. For Uzma Hassan, her name is sourced. Please read in complete context, "Written by Mustafa Afridi, the screenplay is based on the famous novel of same name by Khadija Mastoor." Maybe I have been mistaken in "Main" and "Recurring". See Draft:Ahad Raza Mir, soon could become an article, who knows. M. Billoo 07:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
You have left me spellbound. Do whatever you want to. 39.38.2.24 ( talk) 16:45, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Done M. Billoo 04:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
I was supposed to place the "Done" before your today's message. Some red wikilinks are valid, as I told you for Ahad Raza Mir. Sometime soon, the page for Uzma Hassan could be created. Please bring forward the grammar mistakes, Thanks! M. Billoo 04:58, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
What you say, man? I am saying to look that GA, there's written,
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1 is a 2010 fantasy film directed by David Yates and distributed by Warner Bros. Pictures. It is the first of two cinematic parts based on the novel of the same name by J. K. Rowling and features an ensemble cast. The film, which is the seventh and penultimate installment in the Harry Potter film series, was written by Steve Kloves and produced by David Heyman, David Barron, and Rowling. The film stars Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter, with Rupert Grint and Emma Watson, respectively, reprising roles as Harry's best friends Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger.
Simply, copy the above text in the form of,
Aangan is an upcoming Pakistani pre-partition period drama, directed by Mohammed Ehteshamuddin. It is based on the novel of same name by Khadija Mastoor. The drama is written by Mustafa Afridi and will be produced by MD Productions. The drama will star XYZ (5 names).
Re-word it to merge in continuity instead of writing separate small sentences, and paste as,
Aangan (lit. Courtyard) is an upcoming Pakistani pre-partition period drama, directed by Mohammed Ehteshamuddin with the collaboration of MD Productions. Written by Mustafa Afridi, the drama/screenplay is based on the novel of same name by Khadija Mastoor. It will star XYZ (5 names).
The green text has same meaning, but use either from 'drama' or 'screenplay'. Which source says that the drama is also written by Khadija Mastoor? You must see this link one more time briefly, as you are mistaking, like you did for Uzma Hassan; it is clear there that "Khadija's novel" has been "scripted by Mustafa".
A novel is generally written in basic prose while a drama is almost exclusively written in dialogue. Hope it helps, Thanks! M. Billoo 14:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
With the only green part to be agreed, I disagree your last message,
I am saying that that doesn't matter much. Credits, which will appear after drama has aired will confirm that the drama is written by Khadija Mastoor,[…] Solution for that is that I will cut the line of screenplay in the lead.
You are missing the same reference as you did for Uzma Hassan as said she is not the part of cast, even this was linked first by you and not me. Ehtishamuddin has now returned with yet another unconventional tale, inspired by Khadija Mastoor's novel Aangan…… "Mustafa had been working on Aangan for more than a year. It was undoubtedly one of the best novels of its time and now it's been written by a new writer. I feel such plays are memorable and acquire a cult-classic status if produced well."
Even you linked this too, though it doesn't mention Mustafa Afridi, "It was initially thought out as a film but now we're making a play out of it,… We might turn it into a film later."
Be up to date, and please update! Khadija has written the novel about 50 years back, and she died in 1982. How and why could she be able to script it in 2016? Even maybe you edited her bio and added, "Her novel Aangan has highly been admired as a literary history in Urdu, which has also been changed into the drama." You must know the difference between a novel and a script. I am just referring you the way of writing the lead para by a GA (Good Article), even you were also "jealous" of English-topic articles, then just why?
I may have to link back Ahsan Khan's interview to Daily Times, which is quite a clear as he said, "The drama is written by Mustafa Afridi and is based on Khadija Mastoor's novel."
Though, this one may not be a GA, but see it too,
Harry Potter and the Cursed Child is a two-part stage play written by Jack Thorne based on an original new story by Thorne, J. K. Rowling and John Tiffany… The rehearsal script, which was not a novelisation of the play, was published.
You don't want to sign in, so you are just spreading up your contributions and edit histories in sevaral IPs. Even you may not remember all that which IPs you have used. You like to overlink, so you did in the lead; but you are removing a redlink for a topic which can be created shortly or sometime after, it could be kept as well. You are also not using Template:Cite news completely. And for "second appearance", it is better to use "second collaboration", and why is there any need mention it? The actors may have worked with the same director or the playwright or the production house also. This I consider as useless to explain in lead, well, I am not saying to remove it out completely.
And if I go to correct it now, you will say, "without even discussing, you are breaking MOS:TV". Well, I am not warning you for now, but my next step would be something else. I am not creating any spell over you, but as you said,
You have left me spellbound. Do whatever you want to.
Also, in production section, you have written,
The novel Aangan was originally written by late Khadija Mastoor in 1962… But as the director, Ehteshamuddin was most obsessed with partition, so he scripted the novel along with Mustafa Afridi as screenplayer… "…and I loved Mustafa Afridi's Sang-e-Mar Mar, who is now doing the screenplay for Aangan."
Hope this helps. Thanks, or may be no thanks! M. Billoo 12:32, 27 December 2017 (UTC) [Updated: 13:12, 27 December 2017 (UTC)]
How many times should I say, try understand the difference between a novel and a drama. See below; or as you mentioned, "😴", just go to sleep:
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is a fantasy novel written by British author J. K. Rowling and the seventh and final novel of the Harry Potter series. The book was released on 21 July 2007, ending the series that began in 1997…
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 is a 2011 fantasy film directed by David Yates and distributed by Warner Bros. Pictures. It is the second of two cinematic parts based on the novel of the same name by J. K. Rowling. The film, which is the eighth and final instalment in the Harry Potter film series, was written by Steve Kloves and produced by David Heyman, David Barron, and Rowling.
"I will keep contributing my best, and wishing to not be involved in WP:EW." This is what I've said above. None of your edit I reverted, but you have reverted mine third time! You said, "I think you will probably kill me in Edit war. Respect WP:3RR (indirectly respect me)", but you yourself are not respecting WP:OVERLINK and "Template:Cite news" parameters. And even I am not saying to respect you as you've said, "You are a Muslim and that's a good thing. Yet no etiquettes and changes I have found on you which should be on Muslims."
You said, "you are also accepting this but still ignoring." Your problem is you are not read my messages completely, like it was clear you were watching the removal of 2KB previously but were not watching my edits. You said you were jealous of English-topic articles, but you are ignoring these paragraphs from Harry Potter artcles I mentioned.
You wrote, "Yet if you don't want to leave, you will yourself lose editing privileges." But here, edit disputes are being made by you, as you are removing the sourced content. Since you are not signing in, I could make a request for "page protection over edit disputes". This message too, you don't want to read completely. "Complex reply", No Thanks! M. Billoo 18:48, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Talk page is not for chatting. You said, "I am myself not following citenews rule." I don't know either if you are male user or female, but you still edited the second para of lead without "completing" citenews, and I am not saying it a rule. You wrote, "She will think that the novel for which I got award is stolen indirectly." No, they have obviously bought the copyright for it, and it is very common. I know my english is weak, and I make many mistakes; excluding typos, well, typos are also the problem sometimes; including wikipedia too. For grammar, "which I should not tell you, you should understand by yourself", you don't want to discuss, that means. Please discuss and correct the mistake instead of reverting the whole edit, "I am not reverting your edits because I am jealous of those, else I am reverting your edits because there is really a mistake". Then what is the mistake, "you are explaining each thing like our maths teacher uses to. Explain briefly, no-one has forced you and me to explain things word by word." Why are you not wishing to discuss the mistakes and preferring the reverts, "Be a gentle, leave this", why, just WHY?
Still, you are not understanding the difference between a novel and a play, and this article is about a screenplay based on the novel. Yes, play can be said as modified form of novel, like Harry Potter plays (eight films) are modified by XYZ playwright from Rowling's novels after copyright was brought. Here, Mustafa modified the Khadija's novel into a play. So, "Written by Mustafa Afrifi, the screenplay/drama is based on the novel of same name by Khadija Mastoor." Or in simple words (already above), " The drama is written by Mustafa Afridi and is based on Khadija Mastoor's novel." I don't know why you created a huge discussion on just one sentence, and still you will say, "you are editing without discussing". Your sentence is said by you, "Masha Allah our articles are good then why are you comparing those with Potter?" Or if not then prove it from some good articles; like I am proving my sentence from Harry Potter articles, from which some have been updated to WP:GA status.
Need your reply on the whole. And for Teefa, you are most welcome to discuss on its talk page and I will appreciate it. Jazak Allah! M. Billoo 09:39, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
I guess you are a female. Being a man, I should respect females and espacially fellow female citizens. This is not a GA, and I am not leaving this. You are thinking it funny. Now you see how I edit the page, and then I know you'll revert and this will create another edit dispute, making the page to be protected. So, Rescpecting females. M. Billoo 12:30, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
So sir, once again it is clear that you don't read my messages completely, even if I am providing RS and GA text. Now you see me. M. Billoo 12:45, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi anonymous male! Are you the same as this user was? You don't want to reply may be. You said you are creating another article and probably will not let me edit there. I didn't jumped over here by myself. The creator of this article (may be you, because IPs are 182.182... and 39.38...) has submitted a draft for review, that was created by me. So, who started? And I am not ending, because it is not a fight as you look it. You reverted my edits and not I, even the sourced content. This was just a dispute you were trying to make, instead of pointing out "grammar mistakes" to help. Yeah, you cannot be easily tracked, and do note that you are not a helpful user. I am looking forward to contribute at my best. M. Billoo 15:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Oh! What will people do reading a long line script? That was not a dispute, that was chatting and you also accepted this. 39.38.16.31 ( talk) 06:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
If an edit requires more explanation than will fit in the summary box, post a comment to the article's talk page to give more information, and include "see talk" or "see discussion page" in the edit summary. […vs…] Avoid using edit summaries to carry on debates or negotiation over the content or to express opinions of the other users involved. This creates an atmosphere where the only way to carry on discussion is to revert other editors! If you notice this happening, start a section on the talk page and place your comments there. This keeps discussions and debates away from the article page itself.
and you are one of them. The users like you are already not allowed on Wikipedia. We both are indeed making mistakes then why you, instead of explaining with love, go in angerness rule. What are you? You are #1 user, who gets stuck on one thing no matter what people say. You maybe such like angry in real life but Wikipedia doesn't allow angerness. Respect talk page guidelines. 39.38.16.113 ( talk) 10:17, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Angry users cannot even fit the least of it
— 39.38.16.113
In reply of your last edit on the article infobox, please see Harry Potter article again,
| screenplay = [[Steve Kloves]] | based on = {{Based on|''[[Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows]]''|J. K. Rowling}}
So here, it would be correct, if written as,
| screenplay = Mustafa Afridi | based_on = {{based on|''Aangan''|[[Khadija Mastoor]]}}
Hope this helps, Thanks! M. Billoo 12:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
See message by a senior user below, who suggested for GA, if we both work together on it. OK, I agree with your first part for now, 'sir', where you have said, "Because when some teasers will appear they will tell who has written it." But, as "Written by Mustafa, the drama is based on Khadija's novel", better if we say him a playwright, so "screenplay by" parameter should be used in infobox; well OK, wait. Leave the sock one, actually you are insulting me by saying "she" sir! I may have considered it as WP:BEHAVE violation, or may be not? From where you get this, ¿"when we will fight in this page, administrators will block me for sure"?
And again, for this, ¿"What will people do reading a long line script"? I don't mind if the "chat part" of this talk page, as you've said, would not be back. But please "sir", as you are asking me to ¿"talk with love"?, let me bring my part of it just to verify my edits on the page, on which my edit summary relies. I just want to make my edits clear. If someone, 'SOMEONE' go throught the article and/or visit history to check the edits, which say "see talk page", and he comes here to see nothing, so then instead of visiting the talk page's history too, it would be better to see the "edit story/long 'summary'" right over the talk page. Also, if you yourself were not reading and/or haven't read the full "conversation", it doen't mean ¿"what people will do"? reading or verifying edits. ¿"You simply want to insult me and I don't want that so I cannot allow you for this"? There would be no insult for you, sir, there is no matter if the whole content would be back. ¿"because I have reverted your edit"? sir, you have reverted my sourced content, my edits which relate to the edits on the article, those which I pointed out in my article edits, those on which my edit summaries in the article rely, understood?
As you said that I ¿"try to fight"?, I want you to please check my "fights" on these talk pages, furthermore, you can check article history by those dates if you want to:
Pleasse tell me of which guidlines you were talking about, Thanks ¿"young"? sir! M. Billoo 18:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
¿"over-respecting"! " Just just just just*10^23333"? leave the whole respect. Once again you agreed that you have/had gone wrong by ¿"mistake"?! Ignoring the "revert" part here, you tried to attack me sevaral times, and now saying ¿" that's not contrary to WP:Behaviour Violation […] The language I have used there would not be appropriate that's why I was prohibiting you"? First you attacked on my race/religion, saying ¿" Yet no etiquettes and changes I have found on you which should be on Muslims." And/or " Why will I involve in religious war? Then, you attacked me personally, saying ¿" Baji, I am Male."? Then even tried to attack my personal life, saying ¿" You maybe such like angry in real life but Wikipedia doesn't allow angerness."? Who are you to allow/disallow someone? Your behaviour is even much more rude than you are thinking of mine, I don't know why you put the insult on your device, ¿" I didn't check it correctly that I had written "she please"¿ I really didn't want to write that, it was just a mistake, because you know, […] (that is the function of my mobile keyboard)"? Forget the context in which you said that all, because you too don't understand the context of the same "Written by Mustafa……" You wanted to give it international look so I provided you the text from GA and RS to rely on them, instead you started comparing it with Pagli. I don't know where is better place to talk to you, but this is the only place I consider, for now. In last, if talking about insult or whatever, I should now report your behaviour (182.182.… and 39.38.…) and ¿" get hell out of here"?! M. Billoo 04:48, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Since I can't notify you, please go and comment on Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:Aangan (TV series). M. Billoo 14:14, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Well, I don't WP:OWN the page. But as you have again said without checking what were you saying, so then don't come back here. I don't care if you think you will be insulted by those content, so I am bringing back from Special:Diff/817456407. Anything between the two is resolved when they mutually agree. Since, you said, ¿"it's not dispute at all, this was resolved"? I will also say "RESOLVED". Still, if you remove your messages only, I will not say anything. No thanks! M. Billoo 14:42, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Begoon! Thanks for your helpful contributions on the page! You said, "Still needs copyediting for style and cohesion." You are most welcome to bring forward them. FYI, please see WP:HD, where I have asked for help on this page. Also, if you want to, you can check out the history of this talk page. Thanks! M. Billoo 06:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot ( talk) 20:21, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi! Sorry, I may not be available on wikipedia for few days, I am messaging here after my edits (linked in heading) on Aangan (TV series) page have been reverted by an anonymous; probably the creater of page.
|work=The Express Tribune
than do not write |title=XYZ - The Express Tribune
; it is useless repetition.|work=
, I have linked
The Express Tribune,
DAWN Images and
The News. The News may have been piped wrongly but it worths only in Pakistani articles, as not to overlink in other references in same page.[[Sonya Hussain|Soniya]]
; this is totally useless per
WP:NOPIPE.When my edits were reverted, the reply I got was, "Please please I beg you don't revert it." OK, then let me explain what's in MOS:TV, and why I think my edits should be brought back. Per Template:Infobox television:
|starring=
section, there should only be names of leading cast; like for here;
Ahsan Khan and
Mawra Hocane as said by the sources given.
|picture_format=
section, "Do not use "SDTV" as it is ambiguous."
|distributor=
Hum Network Limited
and |network=
Hum TV
; both are separate parameters and should be used correctly.|released=
is for episode or television special. For television series, use only |first_aired=<!--{{Start date|df=y|2018|4|}}-->
and |last_aired=<!--{{End date|df=y|||}}-->
parameters. Don't write April 2018 manually.|native_name={{Infobox name module|ur|{{Nq|آنگن}}}}
, so use it.However, only the following templates that I added are brought back in the page:
{{otheruses|Aangan (disambiguation)}} {{Use dmy dates|date=November 2017}} {{Use Pakistani English|date=November 2017}}
" I think you should familiarize yourself with WP:MOSTV before editing such articles." Please reply, Thanks! M. Billoo 03:56, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi KGirlTrucker81! I request you to please review the page once again. Please check the difference between the time you reviewed, and then the look it has right now. Which is acceptable, was I trying to destroy the article in view of MOS:TV? Also, please check User:M.Billoo2000/sandbox/Aangan (Hum TV) and let me know iff you found something unsourced or wrong, and compare it with this page. Am I trying to do it right or not? Please check this talk page also, and let me know your comments. Thanks! M. Billoo 20:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
For WP:C-P, see [1] and my sandbox doesn't violate. For Uzma Hassan, her name is sourced. Please read in complete context, "Written by Mustafa Afridi, the screenplay is based on the famous novel of same name by Khadija Mastoor." Maybe I have been mistaken in "Main" and "Recurring". See Draft:Ahad Raza Mir, soon could become an article, who knows. M. Billoo 07:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
You have left me spellbound. Do whatever you want to. 39.38.2.24 ( talk) 16:45, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Done M. Billoo 04:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
I was supposed to place the "Done" before your today's message. Some red wikilinks are valid, as I told you for Ahad Raza Mir. Sometime soon, the page for Uzma Hassan could be created. Please bring forward the grammar mistakes, Thanks! M. Billoo 04:58, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
What you say, man? I am saying to look that GA, there's written,
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1 is a 2010 fantasy film directed by David Yates and distributed by Warner Bros. Pictures. It is the first of two cinematic parts based on the novel of the same name by J. K. Rowling and features an ensemble cast. The film, which is the seventh and penultimate installment in the Harry Potter film series, was written by Steve Kloves and produced by David Heyman, David Barron, and Rowling. The film stars Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter, with Rupert Grint and Emma Watson, respectively, reprising roles as Harry's best friends Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger.
Simply, copy the above text in the form of,
Aangan is an upcoming Pakistani pre-partition period drama, directed by Mohammed Ehteshamuddin. It is based on the novel of same name by Khadija Mastoor. The drama is written by Mustafa Afridi and will be produced by MD Productions. The drama will star XYZ (5 names).
Re-word it to merge in continuity instead of writing separate small sentences, and paste as,
Aangan (lit. Courtyard) is an upcoming Pakistani pre-partition period drama, directed by Mohammed Ehteshamuddin with the collaboration of MD Productions. Written by Mustafa Afridi, the drama/screenplay is based on the novel of same name by Khadija Mastoor. It will star XYZ (5 names).
The green text has same meaning, but use either from 'drama' or 'screenplay'. Which source says that the drama is also written by Khadija Mastoor? You must see this link one more time briefly, as you are mistaking, like you did for Uzma Hassan; it is clear there that "Khadija's novel" has been "scripted by Mustafa".
A novel is generally written in basic prose while a drama is almost exclusively written in dialogue. Hope it helps, Thanks! M. Billoo 14:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
With the only green part to be agreed, I disagree your last message,
I am saying that that doesn't matter much. Credits, which will appear after drama has aired will confirm that the drama is written by Khadija Mastoor,[…] Solution for that is that I will cut the line of screenplay in the lead.
You are missing the same reference as you did for Uzma Hassan as said she is not the part of cast, even this was linked first by you and not me. Ehtishamuddin has now returned with yet another unconventional tale, inspired by Khadija Mastoor's novel Aangan…… "Mustafa had been working on Aangan for more than a year. It was undoubtedly one of the best novels of its time and now it's been written by a new writer. I feel such plays are memorable and acquire a cult-classic status if produced well."
Even you linked this too, though it doesn't mention Mustafa Afridi, "It was initially thought out as a film but now we're making a play out of it,… We might turn it into a film later."
Be up to date, and please update! Khadija has written the novel about 50 years back, and she died in 1982. How and why could she be able to script it in 2016? Even maybe you edited her bio and added, "Her novel Aangan has highly been admired as a literary history in Urdu, which has also been changed into the drama." You must know the difference between a novel and a script. I am just referring you the way of writing the lead para by a GA (Good Article), even you were also "jealous" of English-topic articles, then just why?
I may have to link back Ahsan Khan's interview to Daily Times, which is quite a clear as he said, "The drama is written by Mustafa Afridi and is based on Khadija Mastoor's novel."
Though, this one may not be a GA, but see it too,
Harry Potter and the Cursed Child is a two-part stage play written by Jack Thorne based on an original new story by Thorne, J. K. Rowling and John Tiffany… The rehearsal script, which was not a novelisation of the play, was published.
You don't want to sign in, so you are just spreading up your contributions and edit histories in sevaral IPs. Even you may not remember all that which IPs you have used. You like to overlink, so you did in the lead; but you are removing a redlink for a topic which can be created shortly or sometime after, it could be kept as well. You are also not using Template:Cite news completely. And for "second appearance", it is better to use "second collaboration", and why is there any need mention it? The actors may have worked with the same director or the playwright or the production house also. This I consider as useless to explain in lead, well, I am not saying to remove it out completely.
And if I go to correct it now, you will say, "without even discussing, you are breaking MOS:TV". Well, I am not warning you for now, but my next step would be something else. I am not creating any spell over you, but as you said,
You have left me spellbound. Do whatever you want to.
Also, in production section, you have written,
The novel Aangan was originally written by late Khadija Mastoor in 1962… But as the director, Ehteshamuddin was most obsessed with partition, so he scripted the novel along with Mustafa Afridi as screenplayer… "…and I loved Mustafa Afridi's Sang-e-Mar Mar, who is now doing the screenplay for Aangan."
Hope this helps. Thanks, or may be no thanks! M. Billoo 12:32, 27 December 2017 (UTC) [Updated: 13:12, 27 December 2017 (UTC)]
How many times should I say, try understand the difference between a novel and a drama. See below; or as you mentioned, "😴", just go to sleep:
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is a fantasy novel written by British author J. K. Rowling and the seventh and final novel of the Harry Potter series. The book was released on 21 July 2007, ending the series that began in 1997…
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 is a 2011 fantasy film directed by David Yates and distributed by Warner Bros. Pictures. It is the second of two cinematic parts based on the novel of the same name by J. K. Rowling. The film, which is the eighth and final instalment in the Harry Potter film series, was written by Steve Kloves and produced by David Heyman, David Barron, and Rowling.
"I will keep contributing my best, and wishing to not be involved in WP:EW." This is what I've said above. None of your edit I reverted, but you have reverted mine third time! You said, "I think you will probably kill me in Edit war. Respect WP:3RR (indirectly respect me)", but you yourself are not respecting WP:OVERLINK and "Template:Cite news" parameters. And even I am not saying to respect you as you've said, "You are a Muslim and that's a good thing. Yet no etiquettes and changes I have found on you which should be on Muslims."
You said, "you are also accepting this but still ignoring." Your problem is you are not read my messages completely, like it was clear you were watching the removal of 2KB previously but were not watching my edits. You said you were jealous of English-topic articles, but you are ignoring these paragraphs from Harry Potter artcles I mentioned.
You wrote, "Yet if you don't want to leave, you will yourself lose editing privileges." But here, edit disputes are being made by you, as you are removing the sourced content. Since you are not signing in, I could make a request for "page protection over edit disputes". This message too, you don't want to read completely. "Complex reply", No Thanks! M. Billoo 18:48, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Talk page is not for chatting. You said, "I am myself not following citenews rule." I don't know either if you are male user or female, but you still edited the second para of lead without "completing" citenews, and I am not saying it a rule. You wrote, "She will think that the novel for which I got award is stolen indirectly." No, they have obviously bought the copyright for it, and it is very common. I know my english is weak, and I make many mistakes; excluding typos, well, typos are also the problem sometimes; including wikipedia too. For grammar, "which I should not tell you, you should understand by yourself", you don't want to discuss, that means. Please discuss and correct the mistake instead of reverting the whole edit, "I am not reverting your edits because I am jealous of those, else I am reverting your edits because there is really a mistake". Then what is the mistake, "you are explaining each thing like our maths teacher uses to. Explain briefly, no-one has forced you and me to explain things word by word." Why are you not wishing to discuss the mistakes and preferring the reverts, "Be a gentle, leave this", why, just WHY?
Still, you are not understanding the difference between a novel and a play, and this article is about a screenplay based on the novel. Yes, play can be said as modified form of novel, like Harry Potter plays (eight films) are modified by XYZ playwright from Rowling's novels after copyright was brought. Here, Mustafa modified the Khadija's novel into a play. So, "Written by Mustafa Afrifi, the screenplay/drama is based on the novel of same name by Khadija Mastoor." Or in simple words (already above), " The drama is written by Mustafa Afridi and is based on Khadija Mastoor's novel." I don't know why you created a huge discussion on just one sentence, and still you will say, "you are editing without discussing". Your sentence is said by you, "Masha Allah our articles are good then why are you comparing those with Potter?" Or if not then prove it from some good articles; like I am proving my sentence from Harry Potter articles, from which some have been updated to WP:GA status.
Need your reply on the whole. And for Teefa, you are most welcome to discuss on its talk page and I will appreciate it. Jazak Allah! M. Billoo 09:39, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
I guess you are a female. Being a man, I should respect females and espacially fellow female citizens. This is not a GA, and I am not leaving this. You are thinking it funny. Now you see how I edit the page, and then I know you'll revert and this will create another edit dispute, making the page to be protected. So, Rescpecting females. M. Billoo 12:30, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
So sir, once again it is clear that you don't read my messages completely, even if I am providing RS and GA text. Now you see me. M. Billoo 12:45, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi anonymous male! Are you the same as this user was? You don't want to reply may be. You said you are creating another article and probably will not let me edit there. I didn't jumped over here by myself. The creator of this article (may be you, because IPs are 182.182... and 39.38...) has submitted a draft for review, that was created by me. So, who started? And I am not ending, because it is not a fight as you look it. You reverted my edits and not I, even the sourced content. This was just a dispute you were trying to make, instead of pointing out "grammar mistakes" to help. Yeah, you cannot be easily tracked, and do note that you are not a helpful user. I am looking forward to contribute at my best. M. Billoo 15:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Oh! What will people do reading a long line script? That was not a dispute, that was chatting and you also accepted this. 39.38.16.31 ( talk) 06:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
If an edit requires more explanation than will fit in the summary box, post a comment to the article's talk page to give more information, and include "see talk" or "see discussion page" in the edit summary. […vs…] Avoid using edit summaries to carry on debates or negotiation over the content or to express opinions of the other users involved. This creates an atmosphere where the only way to carry on discussion is to revert other editors! If you notice this happening, start a section on the talk page and place your comments there. This keeps discussions and debates away from the article page itself.
and you are one of them. The users like you are already not allowed on Wikipedia. We both are indeed making mistakes then why you, instead of explaining with love, go in angerness rule. What are you? You are #1 user, who gets stuck on one thing no matter what people say. You maybe such like angry in real life but Wikipedia doesn't allow angerness. Respect talk page guidelines. 39.38.16.113 ( talk) 10:17, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Angry users cannot even fit the least of it
— 39.38.16.113
In reply of your last edit on the article infobox, please see Harry Potter article again,
| screenplay = [[Steve Kloves]] | based on = {{Based on|''[[Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows]]''|J. K. Rowling}}
So here, it would be correct, if written as,
| screenplay = Mustafa Afridi | based_on = {{based on|''Aangan''|[[Khadija Mastoor]]}}
Hope this helps, Thanks! M. Billoo 12:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
See message by a senior user below, who suggested for GA, if we both work together on it. OK, I agree with your first part for now, 'sir', where you have said, "Because when some teasers will appear they will tell who has written it." But, as "Written by Mustafa, the drama is based on Khadija's novel", better if we say him a playwright, so "screenplay by" parameter should be used in infobox; well OK, wait. Leave the sock one, actually you are insulting me by saying "she" sir! I may have considered it as WP:BEHAVE violation, or may be not? From where you get this, ¿"when we will fight in this page, administrators will block me for sure"?
And again, for this, ¿"What will people do reading a long line script"? I don't mind if the "chat part" of this talk page, as you've said, would not be back. But please "sir", as you are asking me to ¿"talk with love"?, let me bring my part of it just to verify my edits on the page, on which my edit summary relies. I just want to make my edits clear. If someone, 'SOMEONE' go throught the article and/or visit history to check the edits, which say "see talk page", and he comes here to see nothing, so then instead of visiting the talk page's history too, it would be better to see the "edit story/long 'summary'" right over the talk page. Also, if you yourself were not reading and/or haven't read the full "conversation", it doen't mean ¿"what people will do"? reading or verifying edits. ¿"You simply want to insult me and I don't want that so I cannot allow you for this"? There would be no insult for you, sir, there is no matter if the whole content would be back. ¿"because I have reverted your edit"? sir, you have reverted my sourced content, my edits which relate to the edits on the article, those which I pointed out in my article edits, those on which my edit summaries in the article rely, understood?
As you said that I ¿"try to fight"?, I want you to please check my "fights" on these talk pages, furthermore, you can check article history by those dates if you want to:
Pleasse tell me of which guidlines you were talking about, Thanks ¿"young"? sir! M. Billoo 18:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
¿"over-respecting"! " Just just just just*10^23333"? leave the whole respect. Once again you agreed that you have/had gone wrong by ¿"mistake"?! Ignoring the "revert" part here, you tried to attack me sevaral times, and now saying ¿" that's not contrary to WP:Behaviour Violation […] The language I have used there would not be appropriate that's why I was prohibiting you"? First you attacked on my race/religion, saying ¿" Yet no etiquettes and changes I have found on you which should be on Muslims." And/or " Why will I involve in religious war? Then, you attacked me personally, saying ¿" Baji, I am Male."? Then even tried to attack my personal life, saying ¿" You maybe such like angry in real life but Wikipedia doesn't allow angerness."? Who are you to allow/disallow someone? Your behaviour is even much more rude than you are thinking of mine, I don't know why you put the insult on your device, ¿" I didn't check it correctly that I had written "she please"¿ I really didn't want to write that, it was just a mistake, because you know, […] (that is the function of my mobile keyboard)"? Forget the context in which you said that all, because you too don't understand the context of the same "Written by Mustafa……" You wanted to give it international look so I provided you the text from GA and RS to rely on them, instead you started comparing it with Pagli. I don't know where is better place to talk to you, but this is the only place I consider, for now. In last, if talking about insult or whatever, I should now report your behaviour (182.182.… and 39.38.…) and ¿" get hell out of here"?! M. Billoo 04:48, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Since I can't notify you, please go and comment on Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:Aangan (TV series). M. Billoo 14:14, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Well, I don't WP:OWN the page. But as you have again said without checking what were you saying, so then don't come back here. I don't care if you think you will be insulted by those content, so I am bringing back from Special:Diff/817456407. Anything between the two is resolved when they mutually agree. Since, you said, ¿"it's not dispute at all, this was resolved"? I will also say "RESOLVED". Still, if you remove your messages only, I will not say anything. No thanks! M. Billoo 14:42, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Begoon! Thanks for your helpful contributions on the page! You said, "Still needs copyediting for style and cohesion." You are most welcome to bring forward them. FYI, please see WP:HD, where I have asked for help on this page. Also, if you want to, you can check out the history of this talk page. Thanks! M. Billoo 06:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot ( talk) 20:21, 28 June 2018 (UTC)