The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: DasallmächtigeJ ( talk · contribs) 11:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
As fate would have it, I watched both Goofy Movies yesterday. I saw this as destiny pointing me to where I am needed, and will take on the review over the next day. Luckily, I have to supervise final exams for 6 hours straight, so count on me to hopefully finish my review very soon.-- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 11:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
So much for the lead.-- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 09:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
This section needs the most work.
This is it for writing and broad coverage. Some fixing is needed, but nothing that isn't doable.-- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 10:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Agree All sources are reliable and check out, I would suggest archiving some of them, especially from smaller outlets and sites that are known to delete content after a few years.-- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 11:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Agree -- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 11:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Agree unless Disney plans a live action reboot... ;) -- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 11:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Agree Movie poster etc. are all fair use, so yes. You could add a picture of the cast/director whatever, but I don't think any of this is needed.-- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 11:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
All in all, the article has the potential to be a GA but needs some additional work/clean up.-- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 11:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
I see you did most of the improvements already. However, I think you may have inadvertedly moved some information into the wrong sections:
All in all, the article has already improved. Ping me when you've finished everything relating to the first and second tier of remarks. I you don't find information on Bobby, Roxanne, or Powerline's design, that's not too big of a deal.-- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 09:56, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, I thought that might happen, after all, the movie isn’t Frozen or The Lion King where every small aspect is discussed some place. I will take another thorough look tomorrow. DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 16:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: DasallmächtigeJ ( talk · contribs) 11:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
As fate would have it, I watched both Goofy Movies yesterday. I saw this as destiny pointing me to where I am needed, and will take on the review over the next day. Luckily, I have to supervise final exams for 6 hours straight, so count on me to hopefully finish my review very soon.-- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 11:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
So much for the lead.-- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 09:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
This section needs the most work.
This is it for writing and broad coverage. Some fixing is needed, but nothing that isn't doable.-- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 10:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Agree All sources are reliable and check out, I would suggest archiving some of them, especially from smaller outlets and sites that are known to delete content after a few years.-- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 11:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Agree -- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 11:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Agree unless Disney plans a live action reboot... ;) -- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 11:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Agree Movie poster etc. are all fair use, so yes. You could add a picture of the cast/director whatever, but I don't think any of this is needed.-- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 11:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
All in all, the article has the potential to be a GA but needs some additional work/clean up.-- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 11:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
I see you did most of the improvements already. However, I think you may have inadvertedly moved some information into the wrong sections:
All in all, the article has already improved. Ping me when you've finished everything relating to the first and second tier of remarks. I you don't find information on Bobby, Roxanne, or Powerline's design, that's not too big of a deal.-- DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 09:56, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, I thought that might happen, after all, the movie isn’t Frozen or The Lion King where every small aspect is discussed some place. I will take another thorough look tomorrow. DasallmächtigeJ ( talk) 16:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)