![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about AUKUS. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about AUKUS at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | A news item involving AUKUS was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 18 September 2021. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 45 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
.
What's the best way to organise the countries in the International Responses section that has a NPOV and is not biased towards any country? AustraliaRodeo ( talk) 21:16, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Text that is veering into forum conversation territory collapsed below. See
WP:NOTFORUM
|
---|
The cancellation fee that Australia had to pay to France was substantial, given the situation that we have a housing deficit, an aged care crisis and some such like. That's an impact on Australians. 2001:8003:A070:7F00:386E:A0A0:2C12:7FC1 ( talk) 23:30, 2 December 2022 (UTC) |
The AUKUS pact is for sharing information on science, technology and industry. The pact didn't announce that the size and type of US military based in Australia would be increased or that the UK military would be based in Australia. The pact was announced on the 15 September US time. [1] [2] [3] Separately, the annual Joint Statement Australia-U.S. Ministerial Consultations (AUSMIN) was held the following day on the 16th in which it was announced the size of the US military based in Australia would be increased. The meeting endorsed recommendations made in May 2021 to increase the size but did not release any details with US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin saying "we will continue to explore" and "which I won’t go into today". [4] [5] The answer by Austin that AUKUS does not have specific reciprocal requirements such as Australia hosting intermediate range missiles mentioned in the subsection, and cited by The Guardian, is relevant and can be retained elsewhere in the article. AUSMIN endorsed increasing logistics and sustainment capabilities of U.S. subsurface vessels in Australia which is relevant. Increasing the size of the US deployment can be mentioned in the following articles: Australia–United States relations, Australian Defence Force, Marine Rotational Force – Darwin, Royal Australian Navy and Royal Australian Air Force.-- Melbguy05 ( talk) 08:05, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
References
There are citations that reference that other countries are interested in joining AUKUS and AUKUS members particularly the US are open to expanding the AUKUS agreement to include more countries. ChefBear01 ( talk) 07:55, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
New Zealand
New Zealand could join Aukus pact, top diplomat suggests https://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/new-zealand-could-join-aukus-6122260
EU-Australia trade deal on brink: New Zealand open to join AUKUS pact in blow to Macron https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1511553/eu-news-Australia-trade-deal-aukus-defence-new-Zealand-uk-US ChefBear01 ( talk) 22:56, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Text that is veering into forum conversation territory collapsed below. See
WP:NOTFORUM
|
---|
The NZ PM said at the time that a lot needs to be done in the Pacific, and it can't always be about the military. She sounded like they had had talks and she didn't think there was enough in it for them/the Pacific countries than more soldiers/costs. There is some doubt if AUKUS is even valid. It hasn't gone through the House of Reps or Senate as all treaties which are more than bi-lateral must. In Australia it was brought in an authoritarian fashion. The PM and only one or two confidantes knew; not the Parliament, the people or anyone. It is too big and costly to just let it come in secretly. I wonder when and where it will be challenged in court. 2001:8003:A070:7F00:386E:A0A0:2C12:7FC1 ( talk) 23:39, 2 December 2022 (UTC) |
The Express isn’t on the list of deprecated sources, but just my two cents that I would avoid using it as a source - many stories are sensationalist, clickbait nonsense. Mark83 ( talk) 10:07, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
When you look at what Nick-D did to the part that I added earlier today, they are wrong bc the article actually makes no mention of the submarine pact, and I would hardly describe what I added as being irrelevant to the Nuclear Proliferation concerns considering that the submarines are going to be nuclear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StrongALPHA ( talk • contribs) 14:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
I think it would be a good idea to add a section that covers the potential enlargement of AUKUS. US Defence Secretary Blinken has already stated that the 'door is open' to other countries joining. There are plenty of articles linking Canada, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea in particular.
StevoLaker ( talk) 16:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about AUKUS. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about AUKUS at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | A news item involving AUKUS was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 18 September 2021. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 45 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
.
What's the best way to organise the countries in the International Responses section that has a NPOV and is not biased towards any country? AustraliaRodeo ( talk) 21:16, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Text that is veering into forum conversation territory collapsed below. See
WP:NOTFORUM
|
---|
The cancellation fee that Australia had to pay to France was substantial, given the situation that we have a housing deficit, an aged care crisis and some such like. That's an impact on Australians. 2001:8003:A070:7F00:386E:A0A0:2C12:7FC1 ( talk) 23:30, 2 December 2022 (UTC) |
The AUKUS pact is for sharing information on science, technology and industry. The pact didn't announce that the size and type of US military based in Australia would be increased or that the UK military would be based in Australia. The pact was announced on the 15 September US time. [1] [2] [3] Separately, the annual Joint Statement Australia-U.S. Ministerial Consultations (AUSMIN) was held the following day on the 16th in which it was announced the size of the US military based in Australia would be increased. The meeting endorsed recommendations made in May 2021 to increase the size but did not release any details with US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin saying "we will continue to explore" and "which I won’t go into today". [4] [5] The answer by Austin that AUKUS does not have specific reciprocal requirements such as Australia hosting intermediate range missiles mentioned in the subsection, and cited by The Guardian, is relevant and can be retained elsewhere in the article. AUSMIN endorsed increasing logistics and sustainment capabilities of U.S. subsurface vessels in Australia which is relevant. Increasing the size of the US deployment can be mentioned in the following articles: Australia–United States relations, Australian Defence Force, Marine Rotational Force – Darwin, Royal Australian Navy and Royal Australian Air Force.-- Melbguy05 ( talk) 08:05, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
References
There are citations that reference that other countries are interested in joining AUKUS and AUKUS members particularly the US are open to expanding the AUKUS agreement to include more countries. ChefBear01 ( talk) 07:55, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
New Zealand
New Zealand could join Aukus pact, top diplomat suggests https://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/new-zealand-could-join-aukus-6122260
EU-Australia trade deal on brink: New Zealand open to join AUKUS pact in blow to Macron https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1511553/eu-news-Australia-trade-deal-aukus-defence-new-Zealand-uk-US ChefBear01 ( talk) 22:56, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Text that is veering into forum conversation territory collapsed below. See
WP:NOTFORUM
|
---|
The NZ PM said at the time that a lot needs to be done in the Pacific, and it can't always be about the military. She sounded like they had had talks and she didn't think there was enough in it for them/the Pacific countries than more soldiers/costs. There is some doubt if AUKUS is even valid. It hasn't gone through the House of Reps or Senate as all treaties which are more than bi-lateral must. In Australia it was brought in an authoritarian fashion. The PM and only one or two confidantes knew; not the Parliament, the people or anyone. It is too big and costly to just let it come in secretly. I wonder when and where it will be challenged in court. 2001:8003:A070:7F00:386E:A0A0:2C12:7FC1 ( talk) 23:39, 2 December 2022 (UTC) |
The Express isn’t on the list of deprecated sources, but just my two cents that I would avoid using it as a source - many stories are sensationalist, clickbait nonsense. Mark83 ( talk) 10:07, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
When you look at what Nick-D did to the part that I added earlier today, they are wrong bc the article actually makes no mention of the submarine pact, and I would hardly describe what I added as being irrelevant to the Nuclear Proliferation concerns considering that the submarines are going to be nuclear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StrongALPHA ( talk • contribs) 14:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
I think it would be a good idea to add a section that covers the potential enlargement of AUKUS. US Defence Secretary Blinken has already stated that the 'door is open' to other countries joining. There are plenty of articles linking Canada, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea in particular.
StevoLaker ( talk) 16:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)