![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATR logo should be updated to the one realeased during the Paris Air Show 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.228.112.213 ( talk) 09:40, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done! Ansede88 ( talk) 21:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
I am wondering should the Article about "Aerei da Trasporto Regionale or Avions de Transport Régional (ATR)" be displayed on the PAge "ATR"? As far as i can see there are about 20 different meanings for the Short Form of ATR.
I know there is a Disambiguation Page, but why is the Aireline not simply a part of this Page and the ATR Page shows the Selection of Meanings for ATR? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodnox ( talk • contribs) 13:03, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
If the "ATR is Number 1 in Turboprops" paragraph sounds like marketspeak, that's because it is: it's taken verbatim from ATR's webpage.
I don't know how much copying is allowed, but the old version (13 Feb 2005 revision) sounded better (and more informative) to me, anyway.
I have flown on two different Aero Airlines (a subsidiary of Finnair) ATR-72s in September 2005, embarking the plane through the front door. I think that the use of rear door for passangers in ATR-72 is not universal.-- 138.23.181.10 22:22, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
I am sitting at the airport with the AT42 parked in front of me and they are not using a pogo stick to support the aircraft. In fact I have never seen them use one. Is it for the 72 only?
It claims that "Passengers are boarded using the rear door (which is rare for a passenger plane) as the front door is used to load cargo." There are several aircraft that board through the rear, B737, B727, A748 and multiple others. It's not rare.
The primary user is stated as American Eagle Airlines but that article says that Executive Air (and Eagle subsiduary) actually runs the ATR. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
I have restored the articles about the planes themselves. Other prop planes like the Dash 8 have their own articles. I see no problem about having an article on the ATR-42/72. Mrld 01:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Image:ATR logo.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
hi folks dont you guys think we need the below mentioned info for this type of aircraft.
like
General characteristics
Performance
You can take a look into this article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermarine_Spitfire or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_172
Thanks.
Nikhilhuilgol 07:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
hey BillCJ thanks so much for bringing this to my notice. Sorry for the mistake.
There should be info about ATR's study on a 90-seater stretch... on one of the three articles atleast. 76.66.196.229 ( talk) 14:04, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Rather than the convoluted ATR (aircraft manufacturer) should the article be renamed as Avions de Transport Régional which is far more appropriate ? MilborneOne ( talk) 18:16, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
ATR (aircraft manufacturer). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:31, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on ATR (aircraft manufacturer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.atraircraft.com/public/atr/html/transversal/contact-us.php?PHPSESSID=f1b0e1072f146c1ce2e3b2f1e2b09e59When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:53, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Images should be updated at the top of the article. There's currently a picture of a very old aircraft that's not in service anymore (ATR 42-300 UtAir) and another one of a 72-500 instead of a 72-600. They make the page look old and dated.
The pictures at the top should be of the 3 different models currently produced by ATR: ATR 42-600, ATR 72-600 and ATR 72-600F.
Here are the images I suggest we use:
The current ones with the aircraft comparison should be moved to the Products section — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabien Garcia at ATR Aircraft ( talk • contribs) 14:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Marc, I understand your point although I don't necessarily agree that's what users want to see first when they land on this page. They're looking for ATR, the aircraft manufacturer, so it would make sense to give them an overview of all aircraft the company produces. And the aircraft comparison should be further down on the page, in the products section with all the aircraft specs. If this comparison stays at the top, I would suggest to use these images:
Also, the length of the aircraft should be written this way: 22.67m without a space between the number and the unit. It would also be good to have the length in feet and inches for English speaking countries: 89' 1.5" for the ATR 72 and 74' 5" for the ATR 42. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabien Garcia at ATR Aircraft ( talk • contribs) 12:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATR logo should be updated to the one realeased during the Paris Air Show 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.228.112.213 ( talk) 09:40, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done! Ansede88 ( talk) 21:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
I am wondering should the Article about "Aerei da Trasporto Regionale or Avions de Transport Régional (ATR)" be displayed on the PAge "ATR"? As far as i can see there are about 20 different meanings for the Short Form of ATR.
I know there is a Disambiguation Page, but why is the Aireline not simply a part of this Page and the ATR Page shows the Selection of Meanings for ATR? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodnox ( talk • contribs) 13:03, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
If the "ATR is Number 1 in Turboprops" paragraph sounds like marketspeak, that's because it is: it's taken verbatim from ATR's webpage.
I don't know how much copying is allowed, but the old version (13 Feb 2005 revision) sounded better (and more informative) to me, anyway.
I have flown on two different Aero Airlines (a subsidiary of Finnair) ATR-72s in September 2005, embarking the plane through the front door. I think that the use of rear door for passangers in ATR-72 is not universal.-- 138.23.181.10 22:22, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
I am sitting at the airport with the AT42 parked in front of me and they are not using a pogo stick to support the aircraft. In fact I have never seen them use one. Is it for the 72 only?
It claims that "Passengers are boarded using the rear door (which is rare for a passenger plane) as the front door is used to load cargo." There are several aircraft that board through the rear, B737, B727, A748 and multiple others. It's not rare.
The primary user is stated as American Eagle Airlines but that article says that Executive Air (and Eagle subsiduary) actually runs the ATR. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
I have restored the articles about the planes themselves. Other prop planes like the Dash 8 have their own articles. I see no problem about having an article on the ATR-42/72. Mrld 01:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Image:ATR logo.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
hi folks dont you guys think we need the below mentioned info for this type of aircraft.
like
General characteristics
Performance
You can take a look into this article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermarine_Spitfire or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_172
Thanks.
Nikhilhuilgol 07:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
hey BillCJ thanks so much for bringing this to my notice. Sorry for the mistake.
There should be info about ATR's study on a 90-seater stretch... on one of the three articles atleast. 76.66.196.229 ( talk) 14:04, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Rather than the convoluted ATR (aircraft manufacturer) should the article be renamed as Avions de Transport Régional which is far more appropriate ? MilborneOne ( talk) 18:16, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
ATR (aircraft manufacturer). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:31, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on ATR (aircraft manufacturer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.atraircraft.com/public/atr/html/transversal/contact-us.php?PHPSESSID=f1b0e1072f146c1ce2e3b2f1e2b09e59When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:53, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Images should be updated at the top of the article. There's currently a picture of a very old aircraft that's not in service anymore (ATR 42-300 UtAir) and another one of a 72-500 instead of a 72-600. They make the page look old and dated.
The pictures at the top should be of the 3 different models currently produced by ATR: ATR 42-600, ATR 72-600 and ATR 72-600F.
Here are the images I suggest we use:
The current ones with the aircraft comparison should be moved to the Products section — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabien Garcia at ATR Aircraft ( talk • contribs) 14:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Marc, I understand your point although I don't necessarily agree that's what users want to see first when they land on this page. They're looking for ATR, the aircraft manufacturer, so it would make sense to give them an overview of all aircraft the company produces. And the aircraft comparison should be further down on the page, in the products section with all the aircraft specs. If this comparison stays at the top, I would suggest to use these images:
Also, the length of the aircraft should be written this way: 22.67m without a space between the number and the unit. It would also be good to have the length in feet and inches for English speaking countries: 89' 1.5" for the ATR 72 and 74' 5" for the ATR 42. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabien Garcia at ATR Aircraft ( talk • contribs) 12:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)