ARA Jujuy has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 1, 2022. ( Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / South America This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force South American military history task force Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles Argentina Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve ARA Jujuy, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:ARA Jujuy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed ( talk · contribs) 09:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC) reply

I'll take a gander at this one. Comments to follow in due course. Zawed ( talk) 09:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Lead

• ...assigned to the fleet upon...: no context for the fleet here.

Construction and career

• reserve in 1918–1919....: I originally was going to suggest replacing 'in' with 'from' here, but have since noticed that you use the 'in' phrasing in conjunction with a date range elsewhere. Not sure if that is grammatically correct or not, couldn't find anything on it on a quick skim of the MOS

I think that you're right; during is better grammatically

• January – May 1927,...: spacing either side of the dash shouldn't be there.

Other stuff

• Image tags look fine.
• No dupe links.

Minor nitpicks only, looks close to being ready for GA. Zawed ( talk) 03:05, 13 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Hey Sturmvogel 66, a courtesy ping here. Cheers, Zawed ( talk) 10:15, 24 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Sorry for the delay, all done.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 15:26, 30 August 2022 (UTC) reply

OK, passing as GA now. Cheers, Zawed ( talk) 10:10, 1 September 2022 (UTC) reply