This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe the third paragraph would more accurately describe APNG as a successor or replacement for MNG, not a competitor to it.
My reasons are:
2601:2C6:4F80:3F1:A814:363:24BC:25C3 ( talk) 23:07, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I think this should be better reflected in the article. Benimation ( talk) 14:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The simplicity of the format, plus the
Specification Revisions, gives a feeling it's just a quick hack of PNG.
Should we mention this ? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Musaran (
talk •
contribs)
19:22, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
The table does not yet list ImageMagick. Can someone add whether ImageMagick supports this or not please? 2A02:8388:1602:6D80:C080:419D:679D:C9F8 ( talk) 17:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe the third paragraph would more accurately describe APNG as a successor or replacement for MNG, not a competitor to it.
My reasons are:
2601:2C6:4F80:3F1:A814:363:24BC:25C3 ( talk) 23:07, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I think this should be better reflected in the article. Benimation ( talk) 14:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The simplicity of the format, plus the
Specification Revisions, gives a feeling it's just a quick hack of PNG.
Should we mention this ? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Musaran (
talk •
contribs)
19:22, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
The table does not yet list ImageMagick. Can someone add whether ImageMagick supports this or not please? 2A02:8388:1602:6D80:C080:419D:679D:C9F8 ( talk) 17:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)