This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
On 17 December 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from AI spring to AI boom. The result of the discussion was Moved. |
Go playing by AlphaGo was in 2016, fake images by Nvidia was in 2018, GPT was in 2018.
It definitely didn’t start booming in 2020, but a few years before.
Each of these above were a surprise at how soon they were invented, earlier, experts were seeing such types of AI at least a decade off.— Homei ( talk) 11:26, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 October 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sintax13 ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Sintax13 ( talk) 23:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved ( closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs ( talk) 23:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
AI spring →
AI boom – A minority of sources refer to the topic as an "AI spring"; most use the terminology "AI boom". 2 references in the article use spring, and 5 use boom. Additionally, see Google News hits for
boom and
spring; the vast majority of "spring" hits are false positives (referring to the season or last name spring), while there are a multitude of articles that use boom.
Frostly (
talk) 18:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
When did the AI boom start? The opening sentence was changed today, and the starting timeframe changed from the early 2020s to the mid-2010s. I’m wondering which timeframe should be included in the first sentence. – Gluonz talk contribs 15:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
The lead mentions philosophical and religious impacts, AI alignment and qualia, but the page does not later elaborate on these points beyond the initial statement and citations. Either these topics deserve expansion within the impacts or concerns sections with published writings or statements, or their mention is less integral to the topic and they can be moved as small mentions within their best associated sections instead of the article's intro. UAguy9001 ( talk) 23:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 February 2024 and 18 March 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LaSulaim ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by LaSulaim ( talk) 22:16, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
The article as it's currently written seems to focus more on the recent history and development of AI rather than specifically on the "AI boom." A more focused article on the AI boom would emphasize the growth, advancements, and implications of AI within a certain period, highlighting characteristic key events, breakthroughs, trends... supported by reliable sources. Many of the articles cited have no mention of an AI boom/spring and much of the information fails verification. Mooonswimmer 01:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
On 17 December 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from AI spring to AI boom. The result of the discussion was Moved. |
Go playing by AlphaGo was in 2016, fake images by Nvidia was in 2018, GPT was in 2018.
It definitely didn’t start booming in 2020, but a few years before.
Each of these above were a surprise at how soon they were invented, earlier, experts were seeing such types of AI at least a decade off.— Homei ( talk) 11:26, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 October 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sintax13 ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Sintax13 ( talk) 23:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved ( closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs ( talk) 23:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
AI spring →
AI boom – A minority of sources refer to the topic as an "AI spring"; most use the terminology "AI boom". 2 references in the article use spring, and 5 use boom. Additionally, see Google News hits for
boom and
spring; the vast majority of "spring" hits are false positives (referring to the season or last name spring), while there are a multitude of articles that use boom.
Frostly (
talk) 18:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
When did the AI boom start? The opening sentence was changed today, and the starting timeframe changed from the early 2020s to the mid-2010s. I’m wondering which timeframe should be included in the first sentence. – Gluonz talk contribs 15:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
The lead mentions philosophical and religious impacts, AI alignment and qualia, but the page does not later elaborate on these points beyond the initial statement and citations. Either these topics deserve expansion within the impacts or concerns sections with published writings or statements, or their mention is less integral to the topic and they can be moved as small mentions within their best associated sections instead of the article's intro. UAguy9001 ( talk) 23:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 February 2024 and 18 March 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LaSulaim ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by LaSulaim ( talk) 22:16, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
The article as it's currently written seems to focus more on the recent history and development of AI rather than specifically on the "AI boom." A more focused article on the AI boom would emphasize the growth, advancements, and implications of AI within a certain period, highlighting characteristic key events, breakthroughs, trends... supported by reliable sources. Many of the articles cited have no mention of an AI boom/spring and much of the information fails verification. Mooonswimmer 01:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)