This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles Military history: Maritime / South America Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force South American military history task force

I reverted this edit, which seems reckless to me.

The paragraph in question had valid authoritative references. In particular, it substantiated the sentence that had a {{ cn}} applied to it. In this particular case the reference's quote field quoted a passage that substantiated the sentence the {{ cn}} was placed after.

Normally, a quality control volunteer should review a paragraph's references, prior to adding a {{ cn}}, but, in this particular case, all they quality control volunteer had to do was look at the reference's quote field. Geo Swan ( talk) 23:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC) reply