This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As per either a recent request at
section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: requires referencing - preferably through inline citations
However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question.
ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the
section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--
VS
talk 10:01, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
We need some new logos for the Fairfax radio stations we should keep the old ones as historical reference, We need new logos for i.e. 3AW, 4BC etc They need to be compliant with Wikipedia logo usage policies, and should be placed on the appropriate articles as Southern Cross broadcasting is no longer Adrian90 ( talk) 08:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
We need some new logos for the Fairfax radio stations we should keep the old ones as historical reference, We need new logos for i.e. 3AW, 4BC etc They need to be compliant with Wikipedia logo usage policies, and should be placed on the appropriate articles as Southern Cross broadcasting is no longer Adrian90 ( talk) 04:47, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Another innovation pioneered on 96FM in 1988 was the 'Input Line' 2211296. Effectively just a humble answering machine taking listener comments, opinions and feedback. The best of these responses were then played back on-air as a segment. Put simply the input line gave the public the chance to speak freely about what they thought about 96fm.
Sadly, the '96fm input line' has long since been discontinued.
Equally sad is not only the input line passing into fond memory, but now in 2009 vehicles like wikipedia are being censored by somebody who is obviously connected to the station.
Now the page has been protected from anonymous edits.
Whilst it is acknowleged that wikipedia is an online encyclopedia and thereby should be factual. When writing about historical events (some now more than 20 years ago) the obvious comparison will be made against todays outcomes.
Wikipedia is not a corporate website designed to promote the station and its current compliment of staff. Nor should it be used to defame individuals. However removing listed URLs from the ASX concerning a public announcement made to the market is sanitising the editorial content to suit the management's purpose.
96fm is a much loved part of the Perth culture. However if it wants to promote its own agenda it should use its own website to do so. If current station employees wish to make alterations to editorial content of wikipedia they should do so publicly by declaring their employment. They should also declare if they are acting autonomously or under instruction from the management of Fairfax Media.
Does Fairfax really think that getting users to log in to wikipedia as 'sexxyfatchick69' or any other username will prevent users & readers from having an opinion or expressing that opinion?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.215.150.237 ( talk) 07:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
I agree that the comment "..run like a dictatorship." is subjective. I endorse its removal. I did not write that comment. However as posted earlier references to the AC Nielsen ratings & the public announcement by Fairfax to the ASX are in my opinion valid references citing fact.
As such these documents are a matter of public record —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.215.63.23 ( talk) 10:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As per either a recent request at
section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: requires referencing - preferably through inline citations
However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question.
ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the
section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--
VS
talk 10:01, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
We need some new logos for the Fairfax radio stations we should keep the old ones as historical reference, We need new logos for i.e. 3AW, 4BC etc They need to be compliant with Wikipedia logo usage policies, and should be placed on the appropriate articles as Southern Cross broadcasting is no longer Adrian90 ( talk) 08:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
We need some new logos for the Fairfax radio stations we should keep the old ones as historical reference, We need new logos for i.e. 3AW, 4BC etc They need to be compliant with Wikipedia logo usage policies, and should be placed on the appropriate articles as Southern Cross broadcasting is no longer Adrian90 ( talk) 04:47, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Another innovation pioneered on 96FM in 1988 was the 'Input Line' 2211296. Effectively just a humble answering machine taking listener comments, opinions and feedback. The best of these responses were then played back on-air as a segment. Put simply the input line gave the public the chance to speak freely about what they thought about 96fm.
Sadly, the '96fm input line' has long since been discontinued.
Equally sad is not only the input line passing into fond memory, but now in 2009 vehicles like wikipedia are being censored by somebody who is obviously connected to the station.
Now the page has been protected from anonymous edits.
Whilst it is acknowleged that wikipedia is an online encyclopedia and thereby should be factual. When writing about historical events (some now more than 20 years ago) the obvious comparison will be made against todays outcomes.
Wikipedia is not a corporate website designed to promote the station and its current compliment of staff. Nor should it be used to defame individuals. However removing listed URLs from the ASX concerning a public announcement made to the market is sanitising the editorial content to suit the management's purpose.
96fm is a much loved part of the Perth culture. However if it wants to promote its own agenda it should use its own website to do so. If current station employees wish to make alterations to editorial content of wikipedia they should do so publicly by declaring their employment. They should also declare if they are acting autonomously or under instruction from the management of Fairfax Media.
Does Fairfax really think that getting users to log in to wikipedia as 'sexxyfatchick69' or any other username will prevent users & readers from having an opinion or expressing that opinion?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.215.150.237 ( talk) 07:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
I agree that the comment "..run like a dictatorship." is subjective. I endorse its removal. I did not write that comment. However as posted earlier references to the AC Nielsen ratings & the public announcement by Fairfax to the ASX are in my opinion valid references citing fact.
As such these documents are a matter of public record —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.215.63.23 ( talk) 10:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)