![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In an attempt to clean up this article, someone added that it is 'rumoured' to first air in Australia on Cable network FOX8 on December 2, 2008. There is no source to accompany this. Network Ten announced it has the output deal with CBS Paramount and will air 90210 exclusivley in the 2009 season according to this reliable source] [6], a network press release. Sorry, but it's misleading to list it as airing on two different networks especially when there's no source to back it up.
Why has the UK airdates been remove???????
Blazemon (
talk) 18:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Where did this "The Next Generation" bit come from? Star Trek did it, and so did Degrassi; I didn't see it mentioned in the sources I quickly perused for this show, however. Also, any comment in the text about rumors should be expunged. We're not a crystal ball, after all. Howa0082 ( talk) 17:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
There is a cast photo out but I have no clue how to upload it and all the other stuff that goes into the process. Maybe someone else can.
http://www.accesshollywood.com/article/9492/?__source=rss%7Cah_Latest Rosario lopez ( talk) 23:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
We wouldn't be able to use that photo as it would violate image copyright guidelines at Wikipedia. Unless someone happens onto the set and takes a photo (unlikely), there's not much that can be done for now regarding a pic, I suspect. Lots of articles on shows end up with a title card grab, but that's some way off (and I'm not sure how well it meets the requirements either). Gusworld ( talk) 00:17, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
From Wikipedia:Neutral point of view: "All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view, representing significant views fairly, proportionately, and without bias."
The easiest way to comply with this policy is to arrange the returning characters/actors according to the dates that their returns were announced.
That is the way the article was until certain anonymous editors—possibly fans of Shannen Doherty/Brenda Walsh—began attempting to place Doherty at the top of the "Returning characters" list, even though her return was announced well after the others. As we do not know the cast billing for the returning characters in the new show, there is no justification for doing this. The editors who've participated in this activity are invited to provide their reasoning here, and explain how these edits are neutral in accordance with Wikipedia policy. Thank you. -- James26 ( talk) 13:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
"...that The CW has begun casting even before a script has been completed. The show is set to start production on June 25, 2008. It could stop due to a possibility of a Screen Actors strike."
and later down that same introductory section it says, "The show will be unaffected by any Screen Actors strike, as the show is covered under the AFTRA Primetime contract."
Is this a contradiction? Or are they talking about the show itself is unaffected, but the CW's airing of it may be affected?
~thanks - and please clarify in the writing so it is not confusing in this way. ~ GoldenGoose100 ( talk) 08:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
which one is it the white adam or the black adam? 74.196.134.34 ( talk) 21:33, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Tori will not be in 90210 after this source confirmed it http://tv.yahoo.com/90210/show/43006/news/urn:newsml:eonlinekristen.com:20080811:TV-23b0c1a896a08f2bce5bd8fe9a8a22d7 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.198.20 ( talk) 11:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
I think it has to go into the uncertain category for the time being, as some outlets are reporting that she is just trying to get a better deal. Lets not jump the gun on this.
The link about is invalid . < http://www.eonline.com/news/23176/sources-confirm-tori-pulls-out-of-90210-spinoff>
That AP report is probably a mistake, however instead of putting him as a returning character, lets say its uncertain until other media outlets jump on-board. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alebowgm ( talk • contribs) 14:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Simply saying "will not" is the same as saying "will never" (because it doesn't specify a time frame).
Since we can't see the future, I've simply changed this to "not expected." Even if an actor was to say "never," it's best for us to merely quote them, rather than predicting what will or won't happen down the road. 207.69.137.22 ( talk) 10:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Before we have to go through this later, when it will be more of a hassle, we should cover this now. Per WP:NOTE, WP:FICT, WP:PLOT, WP:EPISODE, all episode articles must meet the notability requirements for a page to be created. A page with nothing but a plot summary does not meet such requirements. That means, a part from the pilot page, the rest don't need articles. Yes, I looked at the second episode page and it's full of information that has nothing to do with the second episode. Just because it occurred during that time does not mean that it was directly related to that episode. You cannot pack general 90210 information into every page to give the appearance of notability. Brief plot descriptions can be added to the table on the "List of episodes" page, as well as (sourced) the Nielsen ratings. Lastly, when the time comes that a page can be separated on its own, proper naming conventions are in order. In this case, you do not add "episode" to "Lucky Strike (90210)". You only list the name of the show, unless there are multiple 90210 pages with that same title. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 05:47, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Not sure why people keep putting Rob Thomas as the 'creator' of 90210 when the opening credits that have aired on every episode say that it is "Based on the series Beverly Hills 90210 created by Darren Starr" and then goes onto say 90210 is Developed by Rob Thomas... and the others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alebowgm ( talk • contribs) 01:50, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm wondering if it would appropriate to mention in the article about the controversy surrounding the stars of the show
Shenae Grimes and
Jessica Stroup and the fact rumors that they have eating disorders, among other things.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/17/90210-costars-plan-too-th_n_127232.html. Merely a suggestion I'm making. --
Crackthewhip775 (
talk) 21:56, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Are transcripts of the episodes available somewhere?-- 92.230.34.190 ( talk) 08:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Yes there are. 63.168.68.102 ( talk) 02:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Is there any truth to this? 63.168.68.102 ( talk) 02:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
I fail to see the notability of the entire " Production and casting history" section. I think that anything of encyclopedic value that may be in this section has already been accomplished in the "Characters" section. This looks a lot like information that is "of importance only to a small population of enthusiastic fans of the subject in question" per WP:FAN. Please do not remove the fansite tag unless you plan on deleting the entire section or the issue has been resolved with a consensus. KuyaBriBri Talk 16:53, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
The image File:90210splogo.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:25, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Who is she and how do you knwo what episodes she'll be in? 68.225.74.103 ( talk) 02:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Is that Justin whatshisname guy who did the comedy porn video going to reprise his role as Screech? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.168.132 ( talk) 21:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion or exclusion of episode and character, as well as other fiction articles. Please visit the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip ( talk) 11:05, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
I felt that the top of the page was quite long, and very hard to get into / read adequately. I've put a {Very long} tag on to this effect.~ Cortal UXTalk? 22:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
The links points to Nascar driver Ryan Matthews. I'm not sure how to create a new article for the character. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JimmmyThePiep ( talk • contribs) 16:08, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Couple of things. Are the new Melrose and new 90210 really spin-offs? I don't think that is accurate. They are a "rebirth", "extention" or "continuations" of the original shows. I wouldn't consider them "spin offs". Maybe that is the "generic" term for it but doesn't seem right. Just curious is all. Also, why not merge both 90210's together and both Melrose's together in one article for each, separating the original and new series within the same article? Don't think it is necessary for separate articles for the same show. Just an idea/thought. Smile... Thank you! 69.129.170.102 ( talk) 04:08, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Same damn thing. 72.150.18.122 ( talk) 01:06, 16 June 2009 (UTC) <-- one contribution; this one!
Wow, such attitude. I was going to add a disclaimer not to reply with anger but thought those who would reply would be mature enough not to. But "same damn thing" and "what would be the point" shows me I should have added it after all. Well, not being juvenile, here is my response to that: it is not a totally different show. It is a continuation of it and it includes the same story line as the original, with same characters from the original and following the lives of some of the originals. It is a revival of it, that is not a spin-off. A spin-off was Models Inc. A spin-off is Mork & Mindy from Happy Days. Use of a character with a different plot and story line and title. So excuse me, but it was just an inquiry. I don't need anyone's approval, that is what the talk sheet is for. But you make it hard not to criticize the editor when you reply with such ignorance. At any rate, have a good day and no need to bother with a reply. Personally, I'm all grown up and have manners myself, even when tested. P.S. Length of the article has nothing to do with it. The more info, the better. But whatever, it's petty to me, yet I just thought I'd school you. 69.129.170.102 ( talk) 10:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
I agree. Jon the editor ( talk) 09:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Why were the recurring characters removed instead of just putting all starring and recurring on a seperate page? All shows have a long list of both starring and recurring people, which take up a lot of room.
It's nice to know who was or will be on the show in a recurring role. TH43 ( talk) 21:09, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
10/23-Someone just messed up the page. Can someone fix it?! 67.78.233.99 ( talk) 11:30, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
An IP just changed the starring cast in the infobox. Putting aside that there's a formatting issue, which is easy to fix but I'm leaving it alone for the moment, it's not clear to me what order the cast is supposed to be in. The comment in the edit box says: "Orginal [sic] credit order followed by order in which they joined the show." What does that mean? First, what does the word "original" mean? The credit order of the cast when the show first aired? Does that mean the infobox would list cast members who have since left the show? Seems odd to me if so. Then, we're supposed to add cast as they join the show? Wouldn't that become unwieldy?
Also, the Casting section describes when actors joined the show, but the infobox doesn't seem to match that, even before the change by the IP. Anyway, I haven't touched the IP's change because I simply can't understand what order it should be in to know whether the IP is right or wrong. Can someone explain the way it's intended to work (regardless of whether that's a good way of doing it or not, which is a separate issue)?-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:22, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
As most users know, the lead is to summarise the article. I think since this is probably the only time this has happened (DVR average more than broadcast), it's notable to say it in the lead too. It's been reverted twice, though, by IP's. Thought? Jayy008 ( talk) 21:42, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey I noticed in the broadcast section someone wrote that Channel 11 in Australia had pulled 90210 off it's program schedule due to poor ratings. Channel 11 has NOT taken it off air. Network 10 in Australia did take it off air after just 6 episodes yes you're right and on January 11th 2011 Australia had the launch of a new free to air digital channel called Channel 11. Channel 11 is a branch off of Network Ten and is partly owned by CBS so Channel 11 recently picked 90210 up again a few weeks ago and they're playing the series right from the beginning.
I'm proposing that the recurring characters section be removed. It doesn't seem to hold any bearing to me on this page as all recurring characters can be found on the list of 90210 characters page, most television show pages do not have a section for recurring characters on the show's main page, and the section as of now is not even updated with the current recurring characters added. Ryanlively ( talk) 02:26, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Bbb23 deleted the location information as being "inappropriate information". I have never seen the television show, and I am only going by what is in RS. I can understand a "90210 fan club" website might not wanting any negative information about a location chosen, but this is a NPOV encyclopedia. Pearlasia Gamboa chose her residence for the same reasons as the production crew of the television series, who likely ealt with her, as she was co-owner of the residence. I find the information to be notable, useful, and of interest. The residence was already made famous by her on CBS 60 Minutes and in the Wall Street Journal, at the time of the televsion production, so it is almost impossible for the producers not to have contacted her, dealt with her, and known her history. She pretended to be a Catholic saint, and robbed the impoverished of Bangladesh using microfinance schemes, sort of an anti- Mother Teresa, and reversal of what the other micro-banker did in Bangladesh regarding microfinance to win the Nobel prize. I am not sure what you mean by "inappropriate information". Could you please explain what is meant by "inappropriate information", and reword and reinsert the notable content? PPdd ( talk) 19:28, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Here is proposed wording for one of the locations -
Navid Shirazi's house where Adriana visits for dinner in season one episode 10, " Games People Play", is 1156 Shadow Hill, Beverly Hills, CA, 90210, described by John Bruce Nelson Real Estate of Beverly Hills as the largest private residence in Beverly Hills in 1995. In 2002, it was listed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as the address of Pearlasia Gamboa, president of the micronation known as Melchizedek. Gamboa used the appearance of luxury to entrap victims in banking and securities fraud. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
PPdd ( talk) 16:43, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
==Locations==Wilson's mother lives with Harry at 979 Bel Air Rd, Los Angeles in season 1, then the Wilsons new home in Season 2 is 325 Homewood Rd, Los Angeles. Adrianna's house is 101 N. Irving Blvd, Los Angeles. Navid, whose father is film producer, lived in 1156 Shadow Hill Way Beverly Hills , 90210, a luxurious house owned by Pearlasia Gamboa, who owned her own country, the micronation of Melchizedek. This was the largest residence in Beverly Hills, and the only home the cast lived in that was actually in the zip code 90210. In Season 1, Kelly Taylor lived at 2229 Glyndon Ave, Venice, and with her sister in season 2, 339 Wisconsin Ave, Long Beach. Naomi’s pool in season 1 was 918 Palisades Beach Rd, Santa Monica, her patio, 738 Longwood Ave S, Los Angeles, her hotel, The W Hotel at 930 Hilgard Ave, and her sister Jen at 145 N. Rossmore Ave. In season 2, Naomi and Jen lived in a Malibu home, which was the same as that of the cheerleader who sympathizes with Dixon in Season 1. Ryan Matthews’ apartment is 337-341 Calle Miramar, Redondo Beach. Ty’s was 4252 Country Club Drive, Long Beach. The Cooper house was at 5121 Franklin Avenue, Los Angeles, and that of Adrianna in Season 3, 3431 Waverly Place, Los Angeles.
I got this from a French website. There are also 89 locations here [7]. 71.121.31.183 One can verify with images from the CW website and google maps pics, so google maps is RS in this case. 71.121.31.183 ( talk) 02:14, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
I started reading some of the discussion here and it all seems ridiculous to me, so I'm really not going to get real deep into this conversation. None of that information has nearly anything to do with the show. It should not be included at all. I highly doubt that anyone reading this page would have any care or concern about any of that information. Ryanlively ( talk) 04:07, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
References
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 21:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
I tried to create a page for Annie but it got deleted. Also someone told me a previous version got redirected to the Character list page. I think it's about time we stop re directing her pages and let her have an article. The character has been through a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rui78901 ( talk • contribs) 22:30, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
36-42 minutes according to the article. 24 minutes of commercials in 1-hour block? No criticisms on that? I mean, no one has noticed that? Because its fucking horrible. -- RThompson82 ( talk) 03:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
90210 (TV series). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 19:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on 90210 (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 15 external links on 90210 (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:11, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In an attempt to clean up this article, someone added that it is 'rumoured' to first air in Australia on Cable network FOX8 on December 2, 2008. There is no source to accompany this. Network Ten announced it has the output deal with CBS Paramount and will air 90210 exclusivley in the 2009 season according to this reliable source] [6], a network press release. Sorry, but it's misleading to list it as airing on two different networks especially when there's no source to back it up.
Why has the UK airdates been remove???????
Blazemon (
talk) 18:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Where did this "The Next Generation" bit come from? Star Trek did it, and so did Degrassi; I didn't see it mentioned in the sources I quickly perused for this show, however. Also, any comment in the text about rumors should be expunged. We're not a crystal ball, after all. Howa0082 ( talk) 17:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
There is a cast photo out but I have no clue how to upload it and all the other stuff that goes into the process. Maybe someone else can.
http://www.accesshollywood.com/article/9492/?__source=rss%7Cah_Latest Rosario lopez ( talk) 23:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
We wouldn't be able to use that photo as it would violate image copyright guidelines at Wikipedia. Unless someone happens onto the set and takes a photo (unlikely), there's not much that can be done for now regarding a pic, I suspect. Lots of articles on shows end up with a title card grab, but that's some way off (and I'm not sure how well it meets the requirements either). Gusworld ( talk) 00:17, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
From Wikipedia:Neutral point of view: "All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view, representing significant views fairly, proportionately, and without bias."
The easiest way to comply with this policy is to arrange the returning characters/actors according to the dates that their returns were announced.
That is the way the article was until certain anonymous editors—possibly fans of Shannen Doherty/Brenda Walsh—began attempting to place Doherty at the top of the "Returning characters" list, even though her return was announced well after the others. As we do not know the cast billing for the returning characters in the new show, there is no justification for doing this. The editors who've participated in this activity are invited to provide their reasoning here, and explain how these edits are neutral in accordance with Wikipedia policy. Thank you. -- James26 ( talk) 13:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
"...that The CW has begun casting even before a script has been completed. The show is set to start production on June 25, 2008. It could stop due to a possibility of a Screen Actors strike."
and later down that same introductory section it says, "The show will be unaffected by any Screen Actors strike, as the show is covered under the AFTRA Primetime contract."
Is this a contradiction? Or are they talking about the show itself is unaffected, but the CW's airing of it may be affected?
~thanks - and please clarify in the writing so it is not confusing in this way. ~ GoldenGoose100 ( talk) 08:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
which one is it the white adam or the black adam? 74.196.134.34 ( talk) 21:33, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Tori will not be in 90210 after this source confirmed it http://tv.yahoo.com/90210/show/43006/news/urn:newsml:eonlinekristen.com:20080811:TV-23b0c1a896a08f2bce5bd8fe9a8a22d7 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.198.20 ( talk) 11:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
I think it has to go into the uncertain category for the time being, as some outlets are reporting that she is just trying to get a better deal. Lets not jump the gun on this.
The link about is invalid . < http://www.eonline.com/news/23176/sources-confirm-tori-pulls-out-of-90210-spinoff>
That AP report is probably a mistake, however instead of putting him as a returning character, lets say its uncertain until other media outlets jump on-board. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alebowgm ( talk • contribs) 14:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Simply saying "will not" is the same as saying "will never" (because it doesn't specify a time frame).
Since we can't see the future, I've simply changed this to "not expected." Even if an actor was to say "never," it's best for us to merely quote them, rather than predicting what will or won't happen down the road. 207.69.137.22 ( talk) 10:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Before we have to go through this later, when it will be more of a hassle, we should cover this now. Per WP:NOTE, WP:FICT, WP:PLOT, WP:EPISODE, all episode articles must meet the notability requirements for a page to be created. A page with nothing but a plot summary does not meet such requirements. That means, a part from the pilot page, the rest don't need articles. Yes, I looked at the second episode page and it's full of information that has nothing to do with the second episode. Just because it occurred during that time does not mean that it was directly related to that episode. You cannot pack general 90210 information into every page to give the appearance of notability. Brief plot descriptions can be added to the table on the "List of episodes" page, as well as (sourced) the Nielsen ratings. Lastly, when the time comes that a page can be separated on its own, proper naming conventions are in order. In this case, you do not add "episode" to "Lucky Strike (90210)". You only list the name of the show, unless there are multiple 90210 pages with that same title. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 05:47, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Not sure why people keep putting Rob Thomas as the 'creator' of 90210 when the opening credits that have aired on every episode say that it is "Based on the series Beverly Hills 90210 created by Darren Starr" and then goes onto say 90210 is Developed by Rob Thomas... and the others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alebowgm ( talk • contribs) 01:50, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm wondering if it would appropriate to mention in the article about the controversy surrounding the stars of the show
Shenae Grimes and
Jessica Stroup and the fact rumors that they have eating disorders, among other things.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/17/90210-costars-plan-too-th_n_127232.html. Merely a suggestion I'm making. --
Crackthewhip775 (
talk) 21:56, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Are transcripts of the episodes available somewhere?-- 92.230.34.190 ( talk) 08:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Yes there are. 63.168.68.102 ( talk) 02:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Is there any truth to this? 63.168.68.102 ( talk) 02:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
I fail to see the notability of the entire " Production and casting history" section. I think that anything of encyclopedic value that may be in this section has already been accomplished in the "Characters" section. This looks a lot like information that is "of importance only to a small population of enthusiastic fans of the subject in question" per WP:FAN. Please do not remove the fansite tag unless you plan on deleting the entire section or the issue has been resolved with a consensus. KuyaBriBri Talk 16:53, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
The image File:90210splogo.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:25, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Who is she and how do you knwo what episodes she'll be in? 68.225.74.103 ( talk) 02:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Is that Justin whatshisname guy who did the comedy porn video going to reprise his role as Screech? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.168.132 ( talk) 21:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion or exclusion of episode and character, as well as other fiction articles. Please visit the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip ( talk) 11:05, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
I felt that the top of the page was quite long, and very hard to get into / read adequately. I've put a {Very long} tag on to this effect.~ Cortal UXTalk? 22:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
The links points to Nascar driver Ryan Matthews. I'm not sure how to create a new article for the character. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JimmmyThePiep ( talk • contribs) 16:08, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Couple of things. Are the new Melrose and new 90210 really spin-offs? I don't think that is accurate. They are a "rebirth", "extention" or "continuations" of the original shows. I wouldn't consider them "spin offs". Maybe that is the "generic" term for it but doesn't seem right. Just curious is all. Also, why not merge both 90210's together and both Melrose's together in one article for each, separating the original and new series within the same article? Don't think it is necessary for separate articles for the same show. Just an idea/thought. Smile... Thank you! 69.129.170.102 ( talk) 04:08, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Same damn thing. 72.150.18.122 ( talk) 01:06, 16 June 2009 (UTC) <-- one contribution; this one!
Wow, such attitude. I was going to add a disclaimer not to reply with anger but thought those who would reply would be mature enough not to. But "same damn thing" and "what would be the point" shows me I should have added it after all. Well, not being juvenile, here is my response to that: it is not a totally different show. It is a continuation of it and it includes the same story line as the original, with same characters from the original and following the lives of some of the originals. It is a revival of it, that is not a spin-off. A spin-off was Models Inc. A spin-off is Mork & Mindy from Happy Days. Use of a character with a different plot and story line and title. So excuse me, but it was just an inquiry. I don't need anyone's approval, that is what the talk sheet is for. But you make it hard not to criticize the editor when you reply with such ignorance. At any rate, have a good day and no need to bother with a reply. Personally, I'm all grown up and have manners myself, even when tested. P.S. Length of the article has nothing to do with it. The more info, the better. But whatever, it's petty to me, yet I just thought I'd school you. 69.129.170.102 ( talk) 10:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
I agree. Jon the editor ( talk) 09:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Why were the recurring characters removed instead of just putting all starring and recurring on a seperate page? All shows have a long list of both starring and recurring people, which take up a lot of room.
It's nice to know who was or will be on the show in a recurring role. TH43 ( talk) 21:09, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
10/23-Someone just messed up the page. Can someone fix it?! 67.78.233.99 ( talk) 11:30, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
An IP just changed the starring cast in the infobox. Putting aside that there's a formatting issue, which is easy to fix but I'm leaving it alone for the moment, it's not clear to me what order the cast is supposed to be in. The comment in the edit box says: "Orginal [sic] credit order followed by order in which they joined the show." What does that mean? First, what does the word "original" mean? The credit order of the cast when the show first aired? Does that mean the infobox would list cast members who have since left the show? Seems odd to me if so. Then, we're supposed to add cast as they join the show? Wouldn't that become unwieldy?
Also, the Casting section describes when actors joined the show, but the infobox doesn't seem to match that, even before the change by the IP. Anyway, I haven't touched the IP's change because I simply can't understand what order it should be in to know whether the IP is right or wrong. Can someone explain the way it's intended to work (regardless of whether that's a good way of doing it or not, which is a separate issue)?-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:22, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
As most users know, the lead is to summarise the article. I think since this is probably the only time this has happened (DVR average more than broadcast), it's notable to say it in the lead too. It's been reverted twice, though, by IP's. Thought? Jayy008 ( talk) 21:42, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey I noticed in the broadcast section someone wrote that Channel 11 in Australia had pulled 90210 off it's program schedule due to poor ratings. Channel 11 has NOT taken it off air. Network 10 in Australia did take it off air after just 6 episodes yes you're right and on January 11th 2011 Australia had the launch of a new free to air digital channel called Channel 11. Channel 11 is a branch off of Network Ten and is partly owned by CBS so Channel 11 recently picked 90210 up again a few weeks ago and they're playing the series right from the beginning.
I'm proposing that the recurring characters section be removed. It doesn't seem to hold any bearing to me on this page as all recurring characters can be found on the list of 90210 characters page, most television show pages do not have a section for recurring characters on the show's main page, and the section as of now is not even updated with the current recurring characters added. Ryanlively ( talk) 02:26, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Bbb23 deleted the location information as being "inappropriate information". I have never seen the television show, and I am only going by what is in RS. I can understand a "90210 fan club" website might not wanting any negative information about a location chosen, but this is a NPOV encyclopedia. Pearlasia Gamboa chose her residence for the same reasons as the production crew of the television series, who likely ealt with her, as she was co-owner of the residence. I find the information to be notable, useful, and of interest. The residence was already made famous by her on CBS 60 Minutes and in the Wall Street Journal, at the time of the televsion production, so it is almost impossible for the producers not to have contacted her, dealt with her, and known her history. She pretended to be a Catholic saint, and robbed the impoverished of Bangladesh using microfinance schemes, sort of an anti- Mother Teresa, and reversal of what the other micro-banker did in Bangladesh regarding microfinance to win the Nobel prize. I am not sure what you mean by "inappropriate information". Could you please explain what is meant by "inappropriate information", and reword and reinsert the notable content? PPdd ( talk) 19:28, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Here is proposed wording for one of the locations -
Navid Shirazi's house where Adriana visits for dinner in season one episode 10, " Games People Play", is 1156 Shadow Hill, Beverly Hills, CA, 90210, described by John Bruce Nelson Real Estate of Beverly Hills as the largest private residence in Beverly Hills in 1995. In 2002, it was listed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as the address of Pearlasia Gamboa, president of the micronation known as Melchizedek. Gamboa used the appearance of luxury to entrap victims in banking and securities fraud. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
PPdd ( talk) 16:43, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
==Locations==Wilson's mother lives with Harry at 979 Bel Air Rd, Los Angeles in season 1, then the Wilsons new home in Season 2 is 325 Homewood Rd, Los Angeles. Adrianna's house is 101 N. Irving Blvd, Los Angeles. Navid, whose father is film producer, lived in 1156 Shadow Hill Way Beverly Hills , 90210, a luxurious house owned by Pearlasia Gamboa, who owned her own country, the micronation of Melchizedek. This was the largest residence in Beverly Hills, and the only home the cast lived in that was actually in the zip code 90210. In Season 1, Kelly Taylor lived at 2229 Glyndon Ave, Venice, and with her sister in season 2, 339 Wisconsin Ave, Long Beach. Naomi’s pool in season 1 was 918 Palisades Beach Rd, Santa Monica, her patio, 738 Longwood Ave S, Los Angeles, her hotel, The W Hotel at 930 Hilgard Ave, and her sister Jen at 145 N. Rossmore Ave. In season 2, Naomi and Jen lived in a Malibu home, which was the same as that of the cheerleader who sympathizes with Dixon in Season 1. Ryan Matthews’ apartment is 337-341 Calle Miramar, Redondo Beach. Ty’s was 4252 Country Club Drive, Long Beach. The Cooper house was at 5121 Franklin Avenue, Los Angeles, and that of Adrianna in Season 3, 3431 Waverly Place, Los Angeles.
I got this from a French website. There are also 89 locations here [7]. 71.121.31.183 One can verify with images from the CW website and google maps pics, so google maps is RS in this case. 71.121.31.183 ( talk) 02:14, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
I started reading some of the discussion here and it all seems ridiculous to me, so I'm really not going to get real deep into this conversation. None of that information has nearly anything to do with the show. It should not be included at all. I highly doubt that anyone reading this page would have any care or concern about any of that information. Ryanlively ( talk) 04:07, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
References
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 21:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
I tried to create a page for Annie but it got deleted. Also someone told me a previous version got redirected to the Character list page. I think it's about time we stop re directing her pages and let her have an article. The character has been through a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rui78901 ( talk • contribs) 22:30, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
36-42 minutes according to the article. 24 minutes of commercials in 1-hour block? No criticisms on that? I mean, no one has noticed that? Because its fucking horrible. -- RThompson82 ( talk) 03:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
90210 (TV series). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 19:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on 90210 (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 15 external links on 90210 (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:11, 23 June 2017 (UTC)