![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I discovered that this number is the maximum score of Bejeweled Diamond Mine (available for iPhone). At this point there are apparently 66 players who have discovered how to reach this score. The next two runners up have scores of 6.666.666.666.666.666.666 and 99.999.999.999.999. It appears that somebody can choose their high score by some glitch. Noticing that this score can not be the result of normal game-play (for it would take too much time to reach this score), I was wondering how these players have succeeded in acquiring this high score. Anybody? Bcurfs ( talk) 00:30, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Not true. The news ( https://plus.google.com/+youtube/posts/BUXfdWqu86Q) was a joke ( http://www.cnet.com/news/gangnam-style-busts-youtubes-view-counter-not-so-fast/). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.3.50.254 ( talk) 14:06, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: speedy move. Already closed two of these this week which passed the full process. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Guan aco 17:35, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
9223372036854775807 → 9,223,372,036,854,775,807 – Per MOS:DIGITS, for legibility and for consistency with 100,000, 1,000,000, etc. Certes ( talk) 16:53, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
This number seems significant to the year 2038 problem. Please confirm this by adding suitable citations. Thank you. NK ( talk) 20:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I discovered that this number is the maximum score of Bejeweled Diamond Mine (available for iPhone). At this point there are apparently 66 players who have discovered how to reach this score. The next two runners up have scores of 6.666.666.666.666.666.666 and 99.999.999.999.999. It appears that somebody can choose their high score by some glitch. Noticing that this score can not be the result of normal game-play (for it would take too much time to reach this score), I was wondering how these players have succeeded in acquiring this high score. Anybody? Bcurfs ( talk) 00:30, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Not true. The news ( https://plus.google.com/+youtube/posts/BUXfdWqu86Q) was a joke ( http://www.cnet.com/news/gangnam-style-busts-youtubes-view-counter-not-so-fast/). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.3.50.254 ( talk) 14:06, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: speedy move. Already closed two of these this week which passed the full process. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Guan aco 17:35, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
9223372036854775807 → 9,223,372,036,854,775,807 – Per MOS:DIGITS, for legibility and for consistency with 100,000, 1,000,000, etc. Certes ( talk) 16:53, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
This number seems significant to the year 2038 problem. Please confirm this by adding suitable citations. Thank you. NK ( talk) 20:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)