This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: History / Politics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as High-importance).

please don't simply substitute the Indian cabinet template. if you want to replace it with a simple wikitable, that's fine, but substituting it leaves a mess. Frietjes ( talk) 15:30, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

That's not an adequate description. What do you mean by "mess"? And why should the parent template not be used? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:31, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

consistency, see 15th Lok Sabha for example. Frietjes ( talk) 15:33, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

That is also not an adequate explanation; please be more specific. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:37, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply