![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have attempted cleaning up the References section using the {{Book reference}} template. The results are as followes:
Since I don't know who put the {{cleanup-citation}} here in the first place and I don't really know the procedure for removing it without ticking somebody off. I'm leaving this message here in hope that someone may be watching this page. If no one responds of objects is a week or two I'll make the change myself. < Puck 15:48, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
I see a conflict here. I wish to expand this article, but the article name does not reflect the picture on this article. I think this should be changed to the full title in print now. Otherwise I'd have to create another article, on the actual book, and merge this one with the new one. I believe the article's name should be 777 and Other Qabalistic Writings. Seeing as how this is the name of the book, and Liber 777 is refering to a part of this book, hence the conflict in actually adding to this page. Zos 07:25, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Liber 777 is one book. Liber 777 and other Qabalistic Writings contains at least three, and maybe more books. [My copy seems to have the disappearing trick, otherwise I would state exactly how many books are contained in it.]
I found my copy of 777 and Other Qabalistic Writings of Aleister crowley. It contains:
And glued into it,obviously pirate copies of
-- jonathon 02:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC) The question is whether to do n article for every Liber that Crowley wrote, or for every book currently (July 2006) in print, that contains his Libers.
If there is no citation, why not just delete this sentence? I've never heard of "investment" Qabala...let's just say Jewish Kabala and Magickal Qabala are two prominant forms today?
This site helped me out in the study of 777. http://hometown.aol.com/donluceano/gematria777.html -- DreHectik 11:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
I don't see the reason why the Jewish form should be called "Kabalah" and the western version "Qabalah" in this article. Both of them come from the same Hebrew word QBL (Qabal), and there's no official example of the those different spellings being used for specific versions. I have a Jewish book on the Qabalah and it transliterates the word naturally as "Qabalah". It is a personal preference of the person who edited my original text. I changed it back but they remained stubborn.
If you thought the new-age was without fundamentalism then you were wrong, because here is a dogmatic nuance based on nominalism. Someone agree with me and change it back to "Qabalah" (for the sake of the title) or both to "Kabalah" if they are daring.
Saturn-opposition-Uranus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Favonich ( talk • contribs) 01:18, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Interpunct#colon-like (diamond shape) interpunct ... 4.242.174.243 ( talk) 12:49, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have attempted cleaning up the References section using the {{Book reference}} template. The results are as followes:
Since I don't know who put the {{cleanup-citation}} here in the first place and I don't really know the procedure for removing it without ticking somebody off. I'm leaving this message here in hope that someone may be watching this page. If no one responds of objects is a week or two I'll make the change myself. < Puck 15:48, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
I see a conflict here. I wish to expand this article, but the article name does not reflect the picture on this article. I think this should be changed to the full title in print now. Otherwise I'd have to create another article, on the actual book, and merge this one with the new one. I believe the article's name should be 777 and Other Qabalistic Writings. Seeing as how this is the name of the book, and Liber 777 is refering to a part of this book, hence the conflict in actually adding to this page. Zos 07:25, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Liber 777 is one book. Liber 777 and other Qabalistic Writings contains at least three, and maybe more books. [My copy seems to have the disappearing trick, otherwise I would state exactly how many books are contained in it.]
I found my copy of 777 and Other Qabalistic Writings of Aleister crowley. It contains:
And glued into it,obviously pirate copies of
-- jonathon 02:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC) The question is whether to do n article for every Liber that Crowley wrote, or for every book currently (July 2006) in print, that contains his Libers.
If there is no citation, why not just delete this sentence? I've never heard of "investment" Qabala...let's just say Jewish Kabala and Magickal Qabala are two prominant forms today?
This site helped me out in the study of 777. http://hometown.aol.com/donluceano/gematria777.html -- DreHectik 11:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
I don't see the reason why the Jewish form should be called "Kabalah" and the western version "Qabalah" in this article. Both of them come from the same Hebrew word QBL (Qabal), and there's no official example of the those different spellings being used for specific versions. I have a Jewish book on the Qabalah and it transliterates the word naturally as "Qabalah". It is a personal preference of the person who edited my original text. I changed it back but they remained stubborn.
If you thought the new-age was without fundamentalism then you were wrong, because here is a dogmatic nuance based on nominalism. Someone agree with me and change it back to "Qabalah" (for the sake of the title) or both to "Kabalah" if they are daring.
Saturn-opposition-Uranus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Favonich ( talk • contribs) 01:18, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Interpunct#colon-like (diamond shape) interpunct ... 4.242.174.243 ( talk) 12:49, 23 October 2009 (UTC)