Good, just a few things. The one reference is the main problem.
Comments
Did some wikilinking in the plot sections to characters.
"Edward provides his theory of the numbers stations to Peter and Fauxlivia, that it is a signal left by the "First People", an advanced civilization that existed before the
mass extinction event." Replaced first comma with colon. But what mass extinction event? The article it is linked to lists several in our history, but I'm guessing it's part of the Fringe universe. If so, it is in-universe and needs to be explained from a real-world POV.
I'm not sure how to answer this one. The series simply describes it as a "mass extinction event", so I don't know if they made it up for the series, or are referring to an actual event. I change "the mass extinction event" to "a mass extinction event" to make it more clear that it may be one of the many shown in that wikilink. Also, there is no section on the event in the
Mythology of Fringe, hence the
mass extinction event" wikilink. Ruby2010/201318:24, 6 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Oops, must have missed that one. I am not sure who uploaded the production images on Flickr, but I believe they are completely reliable (I've seen the episode (of course), and the images match up directly to it). I'm not sure what you see that is threatening its reliability. Could you elaborate? Thanks, Ruby2010/201303:10, 7 November 2011 (UTC)reply
I see your point but if it is not uploaded by a member of the cast or crew than it might not be considered reliable. Hmm. I think I'm going to ask for a second opinion on this one. Glimmer721talk23:32, 7 November 2011 (UTC)reply
And as
User:Ruby2010 said that images match with the episode, for that I'll like to say that articles are written in such a way that those who have never seen such episodes get to know what are they about. If one has never seen that series how is that person suppose to confirm reliability.
ASHUIND07:07, 8 November 2011 (UTC)reply
All the Flickr source is being used for is this statement: "Chappelle shot the episode in September 2010, with some of the scenes set at a dug-out lot in Vancouver.[3]" You don't have to be a member of the cast or crew to observe filming (there are always plenty of bystanders at every film/television production set). And I'm not sure I know what Ashliveslove's second comment is talking about. The statement "If one has never seen that series how is that person suppose to confirm reliability" could be true for any article. Ruby2010/201317:51, 8 November 2011 (UTC)reply
I meant that like in my country
India we don't get some series shown so we have to get their DVD's but before that we refer to such articles on wiki to check whether its worth buying or not. So when a well confirmed resource is there we can trust it to be true. Its just my personal opinion since I am also the one who is unaware of this series and when I saw it thought of rather watching it.
ASHUIND17:33, 9 November 2011 (UTC)reply
A question: If the reference is declared unreliable and it is removed along with what it supports, will the information of the article be compromised? Glimmer721talk23:45, 10 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Good, just a few things. The one reference is the main problem.
Comments
Did some wikilinking in the plot sections to characters.
"Edward provides his theory of the numbers stations to Peter and Fauxlivia, that it is a signal left by the "First People", an advanced civilization that existed before the
mass extinction event." Replaced first comma with colon. But what mass extinction event? The article it is linked to lists several in our history, but I'm guessing it's part of the Fringe universe. If so, it is in-universe and needs to be explained from a real-world POV.
I'm not sure how to answer this one. The series simply describes it as a "mass extinction event", so I don't know if they made it up for the series, or are referring to an actual event. I change "the mass extinction event" to "a mass extinction event" to make it more clear that it may be one of the many shown in that wikilink. Also, there is no section on the event in the
Mythology of Fringe, hence the
mass extinction event" wikilink. Ruby2010/201318:24, 6 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Oops, must have missed that one. I am not sure who uploaded the production images on Flickr, but I believe they are completely reliable (I've seen the episode (of course), and the images match up directly to it). I'm not sure what you see that is threatening its reliability. Could you elaborate? Thanks, Ruby2010/201303:10, 7 November 2011 (UTC)reply
I see your point but if it is not uploaded by a member of the cast or crew than it might not be considered reliable. Hmm. I think I'm going to ask for a second opinion on this one. Glimmer721talk23:32, 7 November 2011 (UTC)reply
And as
User:Ruby2010 said that images match with the episode, for that I'll like to say that articles are written in such a way that those who have never seen such episodes get to know what are they about. If one has never seen that series how is that person suppose to confirm reliability.
ASHUIND07:07, 8 November 2011 (UTC)reply
All the Flickr source is being used for is this statement: "Chappelle shot the episode in September 2010, with some of the scenes set at a dug-out lot in Vancouver.[3]" You don't have to be a member of the cast or crew to observe filming (there are always plenty of bystanders at every film/television production set). And I'm not sure I know what Ashliveslove's second comment is talking about. The statement "If one has never seen that series how is that person suppose to confirm reliability" could be true for any article. Ruby2010/201317:51, 8 November 2011 (UTC)reply
I meant that like in my country
India we don't get some series shown so we have to get their DVD's but before that we refer to such articles on wiki to check whether its worth buying or not. So when a well confirmed resource is there we can trust it to be true. Its just my personal opinion since I am also the one who is unaware of this series and when I saw it thought of rather watching it.
ASHUIND17:33, 9 November 2011 (UTC)reply
A question: If the reference is declared unreliable and it is removed along with what it supports, will the information of the article be compromised? Glimmer721talk23:45, 10 November 2011 (UTC)reply