This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
475 °C embrittlement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
475 °C embrittlement has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 16, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from 475 °C embrittlement appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 30 May 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 15:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
I've fixed a few minor punctuation and formatting issues.
fixed but not sure if this an acceptable Lead
Done
fixed
fixed and text expanded
fixedPerhaps, too, you ought to add a quick sentence on why one might use more or less chromium or molybdenum, etc, and whether these choices affect embrittlement?
really interesting question. I added a paragraph about that to the end of the Age hardening by spinodal decomposition section
Done
thanks for the compliment. I added another image to explain the 1st image so I hope both now can convey what is meant by the image
wikilinked, slip band explained as it might be advance for someone interested in embrittlement
fixed
fixed
amended as requested
the G-phase is the percipitate, it is affect is explained in the Consequences section. I removed the see also to precipitation hardening and linked coherent percipitates to the Precipitation hardening#Coherency hardening
wikilinked for now
fixed
Ithought it does not fit to explain somehing before it is been used. Tried to explained where I used but it makes the sentence longer and breaks the flow
sentenced rephrased and re-arranged
In the second paragraph of "Mechanical effect", you helpfully explain what G-phase precipitates are, but the term is already in use in the first paragraph. Some rearrangement is needed. I'm not sure if there's anything you can link to here. sentenced rephrased and re-arranged
sentenced rephrased
Done
separated to a different sentence and wikilinked
this about spinodal decomposition and although it is under the treatment section, I think it is more of a trivia. The 'why' here will required a seperate article about radiation affect on duplex steel, but if accelerates the process of decomposition it is generally increasing the process of embrittlement as mentioned in the text that Spinodal decomposition increases the hardening ... (did not include this bit because i assume it is understood)
Referencing is good and solid.
used both references to expand the intro about DSS
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
The result was: promoted by
Lightburst (
talk) 19:08, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by FuzzyMagma ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 20:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/475 °C embrittlement; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Article improved to good article, passes earwig and is adequately sourced in the section mentioned. No close paraphrasing was found, and the hook is interesting, cited inline, and verified. QPQ done. Nom good to go. Pseud 14 ( talk) 01:23, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
The article clearly makes it seem like 475 C embrittlement is a problem only in duplex stainless steels - 475 c embrittlement can occur in any stainless containing ferrite. It is as big a problem, if not bigger in ferritic stainless steels where it often limits their applications. It can even be a problem in austenitic stainlesses where weld regions often contain delta ferrite.
Due to the article's focus on duplex steels - it will not be a trivial rewrite to get the overall flow corrected. 204.88.187.11 ( talk) 13:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
475 °C embrittlement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
475 °C embrittlement has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 16, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from 475 °C embrittlement appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 30 May 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 15:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
I've fixed a few minor punctuation and formatting issues.
fixed but not sure if this an acceptable Lead
Done
fixed
fixed and text expanded
fixedPerhaps, too, you ought to add a quick sentence on why one might use more or less chromium or molybdenum, etc, and whether these choices affect embrittlement?
really interesting question. I added a paragraph about that to the end of the Age hardening by spinodal decomposition section
Done
thanks for the compliment. I added another image to explain the 1st image so I hope both now can convey what is meant by the image
wikilinked, slip band explained as it might be advance for someone interested in embrittlement
fixed
fixed
amended as requested
the G-phase is the percipitate, it is affect is explained in the Consequences section. I removed the see also to precipitation hardening and linked coherent percipitates to the Precipitation hardening#Coherency hardening
wikilinked for now
fixed
Ithought it does not fit to explain somehing before it is been used. Tried to explained where I used but it makes the sentence longer and breaks the flow
sentenced rephrased and re-arranged
In the second paragraph of "Mechanical effect", you helpfully explain what G-phase precipitates are, but the term is already in use in the first paragraph. Some rearrangement is needed. I'm not sure if there's anything you can link to here. sentenced rephrased and re-arranged
sentenced rephrased
Done
separated to a different sentence and wikilinked
this about spinodal decomposition and although it is under the treatment section, I think it is more of a trivia. The 'why' here will required a seperate article about radiation affect on duplex steel, but if accelerates the process of decomposition it is generally increasing the process of embrittlement as mentioned in the text that Spinodal decomposition increases the hardening ... (did not include this bit because i assume it is understood)
Referencing is good and solid.
used both references to expand the intro about DSS
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
The result was: promoted by
Lightburst (
talk) 19:08, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by FuzzyMagma ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 20:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/475 °C embrittlement; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Article improved to good article, passes earwig and is adequately sourced in the section mentioned. No close paraphrasing was found, and the hook is interesting, cited inline, and verified. QPQ done. Nom good to go. Pseud 14 ( talk) 01:23, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
The article clearly makes it seem like 475 C embrittlement is a problem only in duplex stainless steels - 475 c embrittlement can occur in any stainless containing ferrite. It is as big a problem, if not bigger in ferritic stainless steels where it often limits their applications. It can even be a problem in austenitic stainlesses where weld regions often contain delta ferrite.
Due to the article's focus on duplex steels - it will not be a trivial rewrite to get the overall flow corrected. 204.88.187.11 ( talk) 13:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)