![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
What else should we add to this article? 3c48, like most quasars, isn't particularly photogenic, but maybe a radio map would suffice. I've added links to some of the more important papers regarding it: are there more? Also, I think many of the related links are unnecessary. How many links to Aladdin do we need? - Parejkoj ( talk) 23:24, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
The article 3C 273 and this article both claims their quasar is the first discovered. Were they discovered exactly simultaneously, and the results published exactly simultaneously. Then both might be true, otherwise not. Said: Rursus ( ☻) 19:21, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
What else should we add to this article? 3c48, like most quasars, isn't particularly photogenic, but maybe a radio map would suffice. I've added links to some of the more important papers regarding it: are there more? Also, I think many of the related links are unnecessary. How many links to Aladdin do we need? - Parejkoj ( talk) 23:24, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
The article 3C 273 and this article both claims their quasar is the first discovered. Were they discovered exactly simultaneously, and the results published exactly simultaneously. Then both might be true, otherwise not. Said: Rursus ( ☻) 19:21, 1 January 2009 (UTC)