![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The current symbol used to mark "reelected", an "X", carries a negative connotation. It typically means "to cancel" or "to delete", neither of which is intended here.
I'd propose using another mark, such as ♦.
I'm putting this same proposal also under the First Confederate Congress.
RSStockdale 23:56, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
It would also be useful for this to be stated plainly in the article that the symbol (whichever ends up being used) represents this. I had no idea what the 'X' meant, as RSStockdale says above, it looks like a negative mark. It's only by luck I saw this suggestion and learned the "reelected" meaning of the 'X' mark. AnarchyElmo ( talk) 17:43, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
I'd like to propose cross-referencing between the Provisional, First, and Second Confederate Congresses. I think that it should be kept simple. One possibility is after the name to put a mark:
I am also posting this suggestion under the Provisional and First Confederate Congress pages.
RSStockdale 00:07, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The current symbol used to mark "reelected", an "X", carries a negative connotation. It typically means "to cancel" or "to delete", neither of which is intended here.
I'd propose using another mark, such as ♦.
I'm putting this same proposal also under the First Confederate Congress.
RSStockdale 23:56, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
It would also be useful for this to be stated plainly in the article that the symbol (whichever ends up being used) represents this. I had no idea what the 'X' meant, as RSStockdale says above, it looks like a negative mark. It's only by luck I saw this suggestion and learned the "reelected" meaning of the 'X' mark. AnarchyElmo ( talk) 17:43, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
I'd like to propose cross-referencing between the Provisional, First, and Second Confederate Congresses. I think that it should be kept simple. One possibility is after the name to put a mark:
I am also posting this suggestion under the Provisional and First Confederate Congress pages.
RSStockdale 00:07, 30 August 2007 (UTC)