A news item involving 27 September 2008 Delhi bombing was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 28 September 2008.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Delhi Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as Mid-importance). Crime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Terrorism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The title of the article would seem better as "September 27 2008 Delhi market bombing" or something like that, the word "blast" is used way too often in this article. Mozyr ( talk) 11:54, 29 September 2008 (UTC) reply

The article is not clear on who was responsible, or even the status of the investigaion. 129.6.212.49 ( talk) 12:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply