This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
26th Continental Regiment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article reposted after accidental deletion. Dhpage ( talk) 22:53, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
[copied from my talk page - Magic ♪piano 03:38, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Read with interest the changes you made to this article that I authored. Some questions that came to mind as I read the article:
- Are we certain we want to include the previous and follow on units in the infobox of the article? We already had treated that fairly well in the body of the article.
- Is the paragraph title change "1775 history" you made appropriate? The text of the paragraph deals with 1776.
Thanks,
Dhpage ( talk) 02:51, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 26th Continental Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:48, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! Dhpage ( talk) 18:32, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
26th Continental Regiment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article reposted after accidental deletion. Dhpage ( talk) 22:53, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
[copied from my talk page - Magic ♪piano 03:38, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Read with interest the changes you made to this article that I authored. Some questions that came to mind as I read the article:
- Are we certain we want to include the previous and follow on units in the infobox of the article? We already had treated that fairly well in the body of the article.
- Is the paragraph title change "1775 history" you made appropriate? The text of the paragraph deals with 1776.
Thanks,
Dhpage ( talk) 02:51, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 26th Continental Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:48, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! Dhpage ( talk) 18:32, 30 September 2016 (UTC)