This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / European / German / World War I This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force European military history task force German military history task force World War I task force

The lemma should be "25 cm schwerer Minenwerfer", as this is the correct form when used without article, or with indefinite article (ein schwerer..., but der schwere...). See also here. -- Dekthep ( talk) 03:31, 3 November 2009 (UTC) [native German speaker] reply

"...its massive shells were nearly as effective at penetrating fortifications as the largest siege guns in the German inventory, like the 42 cm Dicke Bertha...". This is rubbish - there is no comparison between the effect of an 820 kg and a 100 kg shell. Rod. Rcbutcher ( talk) 05:29, 9 January 2012 (UTC) reply