![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 April 2021. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 16 February 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from 2037 bomber program to 2037 bomber controversy. The result of the discussion was moved. |
I attempted a copy edit, but left a confusing tag in the "development" section. That section needs to be re-written because someone unfamiliar with the sources would be confused by it. Please leave a message at my talk page if you need me to explain why it is confusing. Cheers! - Samuel Tan 09:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
There is no reason to believe that a new manned supersonic bomber will ever enter service in the 2030s. It is best to merge this article with New Generation Bomber (unless otherwise noted). 72.194.120.176 ( talk) 04:28, 25 May 2011 (UTC) Vahe Demirjian
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
2037 Bomber. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
See Talk:Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider#B-2 replacement. Andrewa ( talk) 01:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 06:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
2037 bomber program → 2037 bomber controversy – I wrote much of this travesty of an article. Where does "2037 bomber program" come from? There was never a plan to start developing a bomber (or bomber-like "capability" as the 1999 roadmap author called it) in 1999, much less a funded program of record. The whole point of the 1999 bomber roadmap was that the single author concluded that the Air Force should table development of a new bomber until 2013, at which point it could start defining requirements. This was an asinine idea, and was immediately contradicted in the 2001 QDR and the 2001 revised bomber roadmap. Schierbecker ( talk) 06:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 April 2021. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 16 February 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from 2037 bomber program to 2037 bomber controversy. The result of the discussion was moved. |
I attempted a copy edit, but left a confusing tag in the "development" section. That section needs to be re-written because someone unfamiliar with the sources would be confused by it. Please leave a message at my talk page if you need me to explain why it is confusing. Cheers! - Samuel Tan 09:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
There is no reason to believe that a new manned supersonic bomber will ever enter service in the 2030s. It is best to merge this article with New Generation Bomber (unless otherwise noted). 72.194.120.176 ( talk) 04:28, 25 May 2011 (UTC) Vahe Demirjian
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
2037 Bomber. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
See Talk:Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider#B-2 replacement. Andrewa ( talk) 01:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 06:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
2037 bomber program → 2037 bomber controversy – I wrote much of this travesty of an article. Where does "2037 bomber program" come from? There was never a plan to start developing a bomber (or bomber-like "capability" as the 1999 roadmap author called it) in 1999, much less a funded program of record. The whole point of the 1999 bomber roadmap was that the single author concluded that the Air Force should table development of a new bomber until 2013, at which point it could start defining requirements. This was an asinine idea, and was immediately contradicted in the 2001 QDR and the 2001 revised bomber roadmap. Schierbecker ( talk) 06:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)