From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

bracket

will anyone create the bracket for the college football playoff this year? michigan, washington, texas, and alabama are in. KameronS333 ( talk) 23:28, 3 December 2023 (UTC) reply

game summary

will anyone do the game summary for the rose bowl? KameronS333 ( talk) 19:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29  talk  18:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC) reply

5x expanded by PCN02WPS ( talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 77 past nominations.

PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 03:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC). reply

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Ready to go. Sahaib ( talk) 15:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC) reply

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:2024 Rose Bowl/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: PCN02WPS ( talk · contribs) 02:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Reviewer: Arconning ( talk · contribs) 03:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Will review this! Comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning ( talk) 03:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC) reply

@ PCN02WPS Here are my comments, made some minor copy-edits. Hope they can be addressed! Arconning ( talk) 17:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC) reply
@ Arconning Everything has been taken care of or responded to! PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 22:33, 21 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Prose and MoS

Lead and infobox

  • bowl games which concluded, replace which with that.
  • The winner qualified through to the 2024 College Football Playoff, wondering if this should be ...for the 2024 College Football Playoff?

Background

  • No issues, nice work.

Teams

Game summary

  • After two plays for no gain,, is this an American football term that should be wikilinked?
  • . Michigan took a knee to run the remaining seconds off of the clock and send the game to overtime., "took a knee", same with preceding comment
  • Tables are formatted properly.

Aftermath

Images

  • All images are relevant to the article and have proper licensing.

Refs

  • Earwig's okay.
  • Random ref checks: 1, 14, 21, 24, 37, 43, good.
  • I'd like to question the reliability of 29, Football Zebras. If it's reliable, it should probably use it's name rather than the website to follow consistency with the ref layout

Misc

  • No ongoing edit war, broad and focused info, neutral.
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

bracket

will anyone create the bracket for the college football playoff this year? michigan, washington, texas, and alabama are in. KameronS333 ( talk) 23:28, 3 December 2023 (UTC) reply

game summary

will anyone do the game summary for the rose bowl? KameronS333 ( talk) 19:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29  talk  18:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC) reply

5x expanded by PCN02WPS ( talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 77 past nominations.

PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 03:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC). reply

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Ready to go. Sahaib ( talk) 15:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC) reply

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:2024 Rose Bowl/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: PCN02WPS ( talk · contribs) 02:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Reviewer: Arconning ( talk · contribs) 03:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Will review this! Comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning ( talk) 03:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC) reply

@ PCN02WPS Here are my comments, made some minor copy-edits. Hope they can be addressed! Arconning ( talk) 17:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC) reply
@ Arconning Everything has been taken care of or responded to! PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 22:33, 21 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Prose and MoS

Lead and infobox

  • bowl games which concluded, replace which with that.
  • The winner qualified through to the 2024 College Football Playoff, wondering if this should be ...for the 2024 College Football Playoff?

Background

  • No issues, nice work.

Teams

Game summary

  • After two plays for no gain,, is this an American football term that should be wikilinked?
  • . Michigan took a knee to run the remaining seconds off of the clock and send the game to overtime., "took a knee", same with preceding comment
  • Tables are formatted properly.

Aftermath

Images

  • All images are relevant to the article and have proper licensing.

Refs

  • Earwig's okay.
  • Random ref checks: 1, 14, 21, 24, 37, 43, good.
  • I'd like to question the reliability of 29, Football Zebras. If it's reliable, it should probably use it's name rather than the website to follow consistency with the ref layout

Misc

  • No ongoing edit war, broad and focused info, neutral.
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook