This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there an established rule for what it takes for a candidate to be in the Infobox?
The box can support many.
Precedent is to at least have two parties as 2CP.
2CP is not always right on the day. i.e. VEC incorrectly predicted the 2CP for Albert Park, Brighton, Melton, Point Cook, and Werribee in 2022.
On the Wiki page for 2014, 2018, 2022 VIC Elections, there is a 3-way Infobox for Lib, Lab, Greens
I have heard 10% at a previous election being a threshold to get to the infobox?
4% is the magic number for VEC/AEC funding.
Are we oliged to present a broad spectrum of Left-Right options? (i.e. Lab, Ind, Lib, Green)
Do we just include all candidates in the Infobox and let the voters sort it out?
I saw similar arguments for Warrandyte - /info/en/?search=Talk:2023_Warrandyte_state_by-election
So what are we going to do.
~ Kleinerziegler ( talk) 02:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Could be cool to have them considering it's publicly avaliable. Could make a table based on this: https://twitter.com/Maggie_Perry6/status/1722407663634715028 See below for an example one
Party | LBT | SAP | Ian C. | FFV | LIB | VS | GRN | ALP | T.T. | AJ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Libertarian | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 6 | ||
Sustainable Australia | 6 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | |
Ian Cook | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 9 | ||
Family First | 3 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 10 | ||
Liberal | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 7 | ||
Victorian Socialists | 10 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 2 | ||
Greens | 8 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 3 | ||
Labor | 7 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 5 | ||
Tina Theodossopoulou | 5 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 8 | ||
Animal Justice | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 1 |
Shcmilly ( talk) 05:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there an established rule for what it takes for a candidate to be in the Infobox?
The box can support many.
Precedent is to at least have two parties as 2CP.
2CP is not always right on the day. i.e. VEC incorrectly predicted the 2CP for Albert Park, Brighton, Melton, Point Cook, and Werribee in 2022.
On the Wiki page for 2014, 2018, 2022 VIC Elections, there is a 3-way Infobox for Lib, Lab, Greens
I have heard 10% at a previous election being a threshold to get to the infobox?
4% is the magic number for VEC/AEC funding.
Are we oliged to present a broad spectrum of Left-Right options? (i.e. Lab, Ind, Lib, Green)
Do we just include all candidates in the Infobox and let the voters sort it out?
I saw similar arguments for Warrandyte - /info/en/?search=Talk:2023_Warrandyte_state_by-election
So what are we going to do.
~ Kleinerziegler ( talk) 02:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Could be cool to have them considering it's publicly avaliable. Could make a table based on this: https://twitter.com/Maggie_Perry6/status/1722407663634715028 See below for an example one
Party | LBT | SAP | Ian C. | FFV | LIB | VS | GRN | ALP | T.T. | AJ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Libertarian | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 6 | ||
Sustainable Australia | 6 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | |
Ian Cook | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 9 | ||
Family First | 3 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 10 | ||
Liberal | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 7 | ||
Victorian Socialists | 10 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 2 | ||
Greens | 8 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 3 | ||
Labor | 7 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 5 | ||
Tina Theodossopoulou | 5 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 8 | ||
Animal Justice | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 1 |
Shcmilly ( talk) 05:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)