2023 AFL season is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for
GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Flipstatic Energy, there was a discussion at project level about restructuring the season articles in more of a chronological order, and all of the win/loss tables (once created) will be moved to post-season like it is here to act as a summary for the season, so no.
4TheWynne(talk•contribs)13:15, 27 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Round 4 for next year just got announced. What do I do with this information. Should I make next seasons page because it gives an idea of when the season starts and finishes?
Flipstatic Energy (
talk)
05:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Are you referring to game articles and templates? I would agree that far too much space has been given to this in the past in grand final articles and others, and I would personally include only the network/channel name as a record of broadcaster, with a mention of the oztam ratings. I'd certainly want to get the commentators out of the infoboxes.
Aspirex (
talk)
06:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)reply
I'd also suggest coin toss be removed from the Infobox. Mentioning it in the prose is more than enough for something of such minimal consequence.
Aspirex (
talk)
09:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Agreed. If we used it to write one paragraph summaries of the games, it would be an appropriately encyclopedic article. But as long as the only content for each game is "this is the Xth time teams Y and Z have played in finals", it reads more like the AFL Record's pregame than an encyclopedia.
Aspirex (
talk)
10:40, 27 September 2023 (UTC)reply
2023 AFL season is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for
GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Flipstatic Energy, there was a discussion at project level about restructuring the season articles in more of a chronological order, and all of the win/loss tables (once created) will be moved to post-season like it is here to act as a summary for the season, so no.
4TheWynne(talk•contribs)13:15, 27 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Round 4 for next year just got announced. What do I do with this information. Should I make next seasons page because it gives an idea of when the season starts and finishes?
Flipstatic Energy (
talk)
05:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Are you referring to game articles and templates? I would agree that far too much space has been given to this in the past in grand final articles and others, and I would personally include only the network/channel name as a record of broadcaster, with a mention of the oztam ratings. I'd certainly want to get the commentators out of the infoboxes.
Aspirex (
talk)
06:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)reply
I'd also suggest coin toss be removed from the Infobox. Mentioning it in the prose is more than enough for something of such minimal consequence.
Aspirex (
talk)
09:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Agreed. If we used it to write one paragraph summaries of the games, it would be an appropriately encyclopedic article. But as long as the only content for each game is "this is the Xth time teams Y and Z have played in finals", it reads more like the AFL Record's pregame than an encyclopedia.
Aspirex (
talk)
10:40, 27 September 2023 (UTC)reply