This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to climate change, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Hello there. I just noticed that @ Arcahaeoindris added an undue weight error to the article, and also made a few contributions to it as well, can you explain why you did this? Also, I will try to find positive reactions to COP27, to fix the undue weight error, and to improve the article.
Sincerely, Thenewright22 ( talk) 03:23, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
@ Thenewright22: hi there, thanks for taking this here. The issue is that the majority of the article's length is currently dedicated to criticism or controversies and the summit has not even commenced yet. I tried to add a summary of what is planned to be discussed to balance this better, which was also just removed without explanation. even though there has been a lot of controversy over this, it cannot take up so much of the article. I tried to do this through expanding further background info such as the planned discussion, location, preparation, etc. The section should also be named "Reception" as this is more neutral as per WP:POV. please see WP:CRIT Arcahaeoindris ( talk) 08:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi there! I think the content in "positive reception" could be in "preparation" instead as it doesnt rly relate to reception. There also dont need to be separate sections for negative and positive reception. Take a look at WP:CRIT or even the section in the COP26 page. And I use he, thx for asking! Cheers Arcahaeoindris ( talk) 12:41, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 22:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
What does the "F" in the "UNFCCC" stand for? 2600:8800:204:C400:E06E:D17B:5F84:AC44 ( talk) 06:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2023 and 15 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mayaworthing ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: GardenerOfMen, AllisonStacho.
— Assignment last updated by ChloejWard ( talk) 03:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to climate change, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Hello there. I just noticed that @ Arcahaeoindris added an undue weight error to the article, and also made a few contributions to it as well, can you explain why you did this? Also, I will try to find positive reactions to COP27, to fix the undue weight error, and to improve the article.
Sincerely, Thenewright22 ( talk) 03:23, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
@ Thenewright22: hi there, thanks for taking this here. The issue is that the majority of the article's length is currently dedicated to criticism or controversies and the summit has not even commenced yet. I tried to add a summary of what is planned to be discussed to balance this better, which was also just removed without explanation. even though there has been a lot of controversy over this, it cannot take up so much of the article. I tried to do this through expanding further background info such as the planned discussion, location, preparation, etc. The section should also be named "Reception" as this is more neutral as per WP:POV. please see WP:CRIT Arcahaeoindris ( talk) 08:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi there! I think the content in "positive reception" could be in "preparation" instead as it doesnt rly relate to reception. There also dont need to be separate sections for negative and positive reception. Take a look at WP:CRIT or even the section in the COP26 page. And I use he, thx for asking! Cheers Arcahaeoindris ( talk) 12:41, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 22:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
What does the "F" in the "UNFCCC" stand for? 2600:8800:204:C400:E06E:D17B:5F84:AC44 ( talk) 06:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2023 and 15 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mayaworthing ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: GardenerOfMen, AllisonStacho.
— Assignment last updated by ChloejWard ( talk) 03:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)