From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not free and fair election

Why does the lead fail to inform readers that the election was not free and fair, and that it's part of an authoritarian transition? Is it not misleading and a disservice to readers to make them think that this was a genuine democratic election when every single RS that reports on the election highlights that it took place in an authoritarian context? Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 13:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Agree, the lead violates WP:NPOV by not actually reporting what sources say about the election. And the reactions section also only lists positive reactions, whereas I'm sure there are many sources that call this election out as the sham it is. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 16:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Sources calling this election a sham: [1], [2], [3]. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 16:21, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Rather than complaining about it here, and going to the trouble of tagging the article, why not just edit the intro yourselves? Number 5 7 21:21, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 07:36, 4 May 2022 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not free and fair election

Why does the lead fail to inform readers that the election was not free and fair, and that it's part of an authoritarian transition? Is it not misleading and a disservice to readers to make them think that this was a genuine democratic election when every single RS that reports on the election highlights that it took place in an authoritarian context? Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 13:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Agree, the lead violates WP:NPOV by not actually reporting what sources say about the election. And the reactions section also only lists positive reactions, whereas I'm sure there are many sources that call this election out as the sham it is. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 16:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Sources calling this election a sham: [1], [2], [3]. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 16:21, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Rather than complaining about it here, and going to the trouble of tagging the article, why not just edit the intro yourselves? Number 5 7 21:21, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 07:36, 4 May 2022 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook