From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reactions

The reactions sections looks like it needs some work. The grammar is poorly done, and the list format and flag template should be removed as well. It adds nothing of content to the article. Dunutubble ( talk) ( Contributions) 22:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

I've been thinking the same. I added in the bullets for the meanwhile because it was in a pseudo-list format when I got here, but I've been thinking it can be condensed into like two or three sentences. I just haven't gotten around to it yet. ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 22:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply
The reactions are relevant, reliably sourced & from important people. One says that it's connected to an international cricket match. Jim Michael ( talk) 09:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC) reply
The reactions are relevant, agreed, but the formatting is done poorly. Dunutubble ( talk) ( Contributions) 12:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reactions

The reactions sections looks like it needs some work. The grammar is poorly done, and the list format and flag template should be removed as well. It adds nothing of content to the article. Dunutubble ( talk) ( Contributions) 22:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

I've been thinking the same. I added in the bullets for the meanwhile because it was in a pseudo-list format when I got here, but I've been thinking it can be condensed into like two or three sentences. I just haven't gotten around to it yet. ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 22:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply
The reactions are relevant, reliably sourced & from important people. One says that it's connected to an international cricket match. Jim Michael ( talk) 09:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC) reply
The reactions are relevant, agreed, but the formatting is done poorly. Dunutubble ( talk) ( Contributions) 12:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook