The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A news item involving 2022 Pakistan floods was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 27 August 2022.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Climate change Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide Disaster management Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pakistan: Sindh / Karachi Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Balochistan, Pakistan, a project which is currently considered to be inactive. This article is supported by WikiProject Sindh. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Karachi, a project which is currently considered to be inactive. This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani history. Punjab Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punjab, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Punjab on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PunjabWikipedia:WikiProject PunjabTemplate:WikiProject PunjabPunjab-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Weather: Floods Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Floods task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was created or improved during The 2022 C/B Class Drive of WikiProject Weather, which started in January 2022 and is ongoing. You can help!

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

In the beginning of the article, it is mentioned that "The floods were caused by heavier than usual monsoon rains and melting glaciers that followed a severe heat wave, all of which are linked to climate change.". Is there any proofs to support this claim, specifically that the floods were caused by melting glaciers? Seaml ( talk) 21:53, 1 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Good point - I have added a cite Chidgk1 ( talk) 12:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC) reply

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change

The Indian Ocean is one of the fastest warming oceans in the world, warming by an average of 1 °C (34 °F) (while worldwide temperatures are now at 1.2 °C (34.2 °F) above pre-industrial temperatures, oceans in general are at around 0.7 °C (33.3 °F)).

to

The Indian Ocean is one of the fastest warming oceans in the world, warming by an average of 1 °C (1.8 °F) (while worldwide temperatures are now at 1.2 °C (2.18 °F) above pre-industrial temperatures, oceans in general are at around 0.7 °C (1.26 °F)).

(Reason: Currently, the temperature by which the Indian Ocean rises is displayed in a "convert" notation that uses absolute conversion, leading to a false display of Fahrenheit temperatures.

While 1°C in absolute terms, as in on a thermometer, is indeed 33.8 °F, a change by one degree celsius is a change by 1.8 °F. The article needs to reflect this, so the use of the convert command is misleading at best.

Please edit the places where the convert command was used to reflect the accurate measurements in both celsius and fahrenheit, instead.) 2.202.58.238 ( talk) 09:50, 2 September 2022 (UTC) reply

 Done I corrected the parameters of the convert template instead of using plain text, but the effect is the same. Thanks for identifying this. (I also commented out the reference above since it's not related to the request and confuses the talk page layout.) -- Bsherr ( talk) 17:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Under International Response it says for Bangladesh that "On August 2030, Bangladeshi PM...", whereas the footnote says that it was on "30 August", which also makes more sense. Pazul42 ( talk) 08:24, 3 September 2022 (UTC) reply

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Following the discussion, the merge tag should be removed and replaced with {{ being merged}}. 47.16.96.33 ( talk) 19:22, 5 September 2022 (UTC) reply

 Already done in [1] Ductwork ( talk) 21:44, 5 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The article for the 2022 Sindh floods shows that 1,569 people died in the province, cited and all. If you combine that with deaths in Balochistan, Punjab etc, you get a death toll of 2,505. Should the death toll be changed? Quake1234 ( talk) 12:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC) reply

There is some user difference of opinion about the statement by the Sherry Rehman (government minister) saying that "one third of Pakistan was under water". That statement was widely reported and continues to be reported (as of February 2023). I was the user who added the scientific research references that suggested a lower flooding area in the region of 10-12%. I left the original ministerial claim not because it may or may not be correct, but because a government official had made the claim. Therefore it is notable and encyclopedic to show the difference between the government position and those of some scientists. I think it's wrong to remove any mention of the "one third" claim, because it doesn't help the reader of this article to gain an understanding of the events as they happened at the time and, perhaps most importantly, the international reaction to the floods in possible large part driven by the "one third" claim. I noticed that all mention of the "one third" claim was removed, so I reverted. That was then reverted back, but I'm not going to revert again at this time to avoid an edit war. I think it's actually quite interesting and notable to see how the political reaction to these floods was stated at the time. It would be interesting to see what everyone else thinks about this. Seaweed ( talk) 14:34, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply