This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of
cricket. Please participate by visiting the
project and
talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based
WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in
one big list and in
CSV format)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
@
Bs1jac and
Mashfi23: Theres some confusion going on here. USA and Namibia are saying these are only T20s but only Jersey and CI is calling it T20Is. CI did such mistake before (Remember Oman-SL?). Shouldve waited and not removed the redirect that early.
Human (
talk) 09:19, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
In theory, Namibia's word should be the most important since they're the host... but ESPNcricinfo corrected what they did with Oman-SL a good while ago- while this time around they suddenly changed the status on the day of the match. Would be a bummer if these aren't official though; David Wiese put on a hell of a show today
Mashfi23 (
talk) 09:28, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
@A Simple Human Why? Its showing as T20I, so whats the harm? Can always adjust to a non-t20i status tournament again, and there will be enough coverage regardless. "Warm ups" and "practice" doesnt mean it isnt t20i, as both can be used to describe t20is before a major tournament. No harm done either way.
Bs1jac (
talk) 09:29, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
As Mashfi23 says, on this occasion Cricinfo have added as T20I on the day of the event, not in advance, which suggests new information. Certainly keep an eye on the status, and I won't be touching any stats until clearer either way.
Bs1jac (
talk) 09:34, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Bs1jac: Sure this article can remain as it passed notability already regardless of status. But there's no need to get riled up. I wasn't blaming you or something just stated my opinion. I know it takes a lot of work to create an article and with all these matches going you might be in your best state. Take a chill pill maybe
Human (
talk) 09:38, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Haha, I'm not the one who is riled up. Not sure what gives you that impression? As you said, the redirect could be removed even if it isn't T20I, so all that would be required is a wording change and removal of debuts. PS: definitely too many games going on.
Bs1jac (
talk) 09:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Ps. Checking with Cricinfo.
Bs1jac (
talk) 09:49, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
@
A Simple Human: Hearing from EC that another possibility is that games involving USA may not be official, but the Nam-Jer games could be. Very confusing! Busy with work today so will find out later. Ps: Cricinfo are checking; unfortunately I think these may not be T20I after all.
Bs1jac (
talk) 10:20, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Match number has been removed from the first game so looks like this is not T20I.
Bs1jac (
talk) 10:35, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
They weren't on the ICC fixtures list either (when I checked earlier). Shame they're not T20Is! LugnutsFire Walk with Me 11:10, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of
cricket. Please participate by visiting the
project and
talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based
WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in
one big list and in
CSV format)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
@
Bs1jac and
Mashfi23: Theres some confusion going on here. USA and Namibia are saying these are only T20s but only Jersey and CI is calling it T20Is. CI did such mistake before (Remember Oman-SL?). Shouldve waited and not removed the redirect that early.
Human (
talk) 09:19, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
In theory, Namibia's word should be the most important since they're the host... but ESPNcricinfo corrected what they did with Oman-SL a good while ago- while this time around they suddenly changed the status on the day of the match. Would be a bummer if these aren't official though; David Wiese put on a hell of a show today
Mashfi23 (
talk) 09:28, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
@A Simple Human Why? Its showing as T20I, so whats the harm? Can always adjust to a non-t20i status tournament again, and there will be enough coverage regardless. "Warm ups" and "practice" doesnt mean it isnt t20i, as both can be used to describe t20is before a major tournament. No harm done either way.
Bs1jac (
talk) 09:29, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
As Mashfi23 says, on this occasion Cricinfo have added as T20I on the day of the event, not in advance, which suggests new information. Certainly keep an eye on the status, and I won't be touching any stats until clearer either way.
Bs1jac (
talk) 09:34, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Bs1jac: Sure this article can remain as it passed notability already regardless of status. But there's no need to get riled up. I wasn't blaming you or something just stated my opinion. I know it takes a lot of work to create an article and with all these matches going you might be in your best state. Take a chill pill maybe
Human (
talk) 09:38, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Haha, I'm not the one who is riled up. Not sure what gives you that impression? As you said, the redirect could be removed even if it isn't T20I, so all that would be required is a wording change and removal of debuts. PS: definitely too many games going on.
Bs1jac (
talk) 09:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Ps. Checking with Cricinfo.
Bs1jac (
talk) 09:49, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
@
A Simple Human: Hearing from EC that another possibility is that games involving USA may not be official, but the Nam-Jer games could be. Very confusing! Busy with work today so will find out later. Ps: Cricinfo are checking; unfortunately I think these may not be T20I after all.
Bs1jac (
talk) 10:20, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Match number has been removed from the first game so looks like this is not T20I.
Bs1jac (
talk) 10:35, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply
They weren't on the ICC fixtures list either (when I checked earlier). Shame they're not T20Is! LugnutsFire Walk with Me 11:10, 29 June 2022 (UTC)reply