![]() | 2022 Myrtle Beach Bowl was nominated as a Sports and recreation good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 29, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | A fact from 2022 Myrtle Beach Bowl appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 19 January 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk)
21:18, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
5x expanded by PCN02WPS ( talk) and 2601:5C5:4201:F2C0:6838:E7DD:9D0C:400B ( talk). Nominated by PCN02WPS ( talk) at 20:12, 20 December 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: - Not done
Overall:
@
PCN02WPS: Good article but I can't seem to verify alt0. I can verify alt1 just not alt0. Can you explain or provide a different source.
Onegreatjoke (
talk)
01:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
That was as close as UConn (6-7) could get in its first postseason appearance since 2015.PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 22:37, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Grondemar ( talk · contribs) 21:35, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I was surprised to see this article pop up as a good article nominee so swiftly after it concluded, and see that you've been doing a lot of great work getting bowl game articles nominated and passed as good articles. I have had a long-stagnant project to build a featured topic around the UConn bowl games, and previously brought
2009 International Bowl and
2010 PapaJohns.com Bowl to FA and
List of UConn Huskies bowl games to FL. I'll be using those articles as a baseline for formatting and comprehensiveness when evaluating this article, recognizing that the GA criteria doesn't quite require the same level of comprehensiveness that the FA criteria does. However, if it is possible to push this article along to FAC, I'm more than happy to be of as much assistance as possible.
I am still working on going through the article and will leave thoughts and issues below as I find them. – Grondemar 20:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Will continue reviewing later. – Grondemar 20:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
A couple of comments on sources:
– Grondemar 23:14, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
@ Grondemar: Hi and thank you for the review! I am doing some traveling at the moment so I can't guarantee that I will get to this super quickly. I do appreciate your recommendations and I will get to addressing them as soon as I can, if that's alright with you. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 20:44, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
![]() | 2022 Myrtle Beach Bowl was nominated as a Sports and recreation good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 29, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | A fact from 2022 Myrtle Beach Bowl appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 19 January 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk)
21:18, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
5x expanded by PCN02WPS ( talk) and 2601:5C5:4201:F2C0:6838:E7DD:9D0C:400B ( talk). Nominated by PCN02WPS ( talk) at 20:12, 20 December 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: - Not done
Overall:
@
PCN02WPS: Good article but I can't seem to verify alt0. I can verify alt1 just not alt0. Can you explain or provide a different source.
Onegreatjoke (
talk)
01:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
That was as close as UConn (6-7) could get in its first postseason appearance since 2015.PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 22:37, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Grondemar ( talk · contribs) 21:35, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I was surprised to see this article pop up as a good article nominee so swiftly after it concluded, and see that you've been doing a lot of great work getting bowl game articles nominated and passed as good articles. I have had a long-stagnant project to build a featured topic around the UConn bowl games, and previously brought
2009 International Bowl and
2010 PapaJohns.com Bowl to FA and
List of UConn Huskies bowl games to FL. I'll be using those articles as a baseline for formatting and comprehensiveness when evaluating this article, recognizing that the GA criteria doesn't quite require the same level of comprehensiveness that the FA criteria does. However, if it is possible to push this article along to FAC, I'm more than happy to be of as much assistance as possible.
I am still working on going through the article and will leave thoughts and issues below as I find them. – Grondemar 20:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Will continue reviewing later. – Grondemar 20:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
A couple of comments on sources:
– Grondemar 23:14, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
@ Grondemar: Hi and thank you for the review! I am doing some traveling at the moment so I can't guarantee that I will get to this super quickly. I do appreciate your recommendations and I will get to addressing them as soon as I can, if that's alright with you. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 20:44, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|