![]() | 2022 Gasparilla Bowl has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 26, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from 2022 Gasparilla Bowl appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 22 January 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Aoidh (
talk)
05:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
5x expanded by PCN02WPS ( talk). Self-nominated at 22:15, 24 December 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: SpaceEconomist192 ( talk · contribs) 17:24, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
A good article is—
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) |
Per MOS:INTRO, the lead section should be accessible to a broad audience. The 2nd paragraph has way too much football terminology, I couldn't understand whole sentences. If possible, try to substitute jargon like first down, punt, field goal, drive, muffed punt and turnover to layman's terms.
|
![]() |
(b) (MoS) | Per
MOS:LEADCITE, inline citations in the lead section should be avoided if possible. The two inline citations in The 14th annual Gasparilla Bowl, the game began at 6:35 p.m. EST and was aired on ESPN...should then be removed and the respective content added further down in the article.
|
![]() |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (references) | Checked references #1, #4, #7, #11, #12 and #17 of
this version
The #4 source (College Football Poll) doesn't seem reliable for that kind of information.
The #7 source (Missouri Tigers Athletics) is down, at least for me.
The #12 source (247 Sports) doesn't cover that Demon Deacons lost JJ Roberts to the transfer portal.
|
![]() |
(b) (citations to reliable sources) | The favorite and attendance number stated in the infobox need sources.
|
![]() |
(c) (original research) | From my read, the #11 (College Football News) source doesn't cover this sentence, While the passing offense was certainly viewed...it needs to be rewritten or removed from the article.
|
![]() |
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism) | Earwig's Copyvio Detector says violation unlikely (6,5%). |
![]() |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | A post-match section should be included in the article. Don't forget to update the lead afterwards.
|
![]() |
(b) (focused) | The game summary is a tad too detailed but not the enough to fail. |
![]() |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
While the passing offense was certainly viewed as a strength...Why is it so certain? «Certainly» is a word to watch, it needs to be removed.
|
![]() |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
Everything peaceful |
![]() |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | This article could benefit from images. Captain, head coach and stadium photos would be great.
|
![]() |
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | The images are relevant and have a suitable caption |
![]() |
Result | Notes |
---|---|
y}} | The reviewer has left no comments here |
![]() | 2022 Gasparilla Bowl has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 26, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from 2022 Gasparilla Bowl appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 22 January 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Aoidh (
talk)
05:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
5x expanded by PCN02WPS ( talk). Self-nominated at 22:15, 24 December 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: SpaceEconomist192 ( talk · contribs) 17:24, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
A good article is—
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) |
Per MOS:INTRO, the lead section should be accessible to a broad audience. The 2nd paragraph has way too much football terminology, I couldn't understand whole sentences. If possible, try to substitute jargon like first down, punt, field goal, drive, muffed punt and turnover to layman's terms.
|
![]() |
(b) (MoS) | Per
MOS:LEADCITE, inline citations in the lead section should be avoided if possible. The two inline citations in The 14th annual Gasparilla Bowl, the game began at 6:35 p.m. EST and was aired on ESPN...should then be removed and the respective content added further down in the article.
|
![]() |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (references) | Checked references #1, #4, #7, #11, #12 and #17 of
this version
The #4 source (College Football Poll) doesn't seem reliable for that kind of information.
The #7 source (Missouri Tigers Athletics) is down, at least for me.
The #12 source (247 Sports) doesn't cover that Demon Deacons lost JJ Roberts to the transfer portal.
|
![]() |
(b) (citations to reliable sources) | The favorite and attendance number stated in the infobox need sources.
|
![]() |
(c) (original research) | From my read, the #11 (College Football News) source doesn't cover this sentence, While the passing offense was certainly viewed...it needs to be rewritten or removed from the article.
|
![]() |
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism) | Earwig's Copyvio Detector says violation unlikely (6,5%). |
![]() |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | A post-match section should be included in the article. Don't forget to update the lead afterwards.
|
![]() |
(b) (focused) | The game summary is a tad too detailed but not the enough to fail. |
![]() |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
While the passing offense was certainly viewed as a strength...Why is it so certain? «Certainly» is a word to watch, it needs to be removed.
|
![]() |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
Everything peaceful |
![]() |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | This article could benefit from images. Captain, head coach and stadium photos would be great.
|
![]() |
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | The images are relevant and have a suitable caption |
![]() |
Result | Notes |
---|---|
y}} | The reviewer has left no comments here |