![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to
provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2021 in spaceflight's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "us-com":
Reference named "gunter-falcon9":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:55, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
I don’t understand why SLS and Orion test flights are under “lunar exploration” while Starliner’s test flight is under Human Spaceflight, and Starship test flights are under rocket innovation. All of these vessels are comparable and should be covered in the same section for consistency. Grey Wanderer ( talk) 21:10, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
"Houston, we have a problem."
We've hit Wikipedia's post expansion include size limit for templates.
This means templates near the bottom of the screen won't work any more.
If it gets much worse, references will start to fail.
I'm not sure what the best solution is, but if the page can be split at June 30th that should solve the problem. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 🎄 23:16, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
We could have tried to reduce the size first, that would have been far less impactful. But it's likely the page will only grow over time. What do we do with the introduction and stats? I would prefer to keep them yearly for consistency and to have more material. We could write them in one article and then transclude them in the other. Alternatively we can keep 2021 in spaceflight for text and stats and then have the launch lists separate. -- mfb ( talk) 21:55, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
I moved this page back to 2021 in spaceflight, created the new 2021 in spaceflight (January–June) with launches only and reduced 2021 in spaceflight (July–December) to launches. I don't see remaining reference errors or other obvious problems, but more eyes help. I merged deeps-space rendezvous and kept EVAs here as these lists don't get long. -- mfb ( talk) 10:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
I expect most users here to also watch the subpages, but anyway: There is a proposed move discussion for them. "2021 in spaceflight (January–June)" → "List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2021" and analogous for the second half. -- mfb ( talk) 02:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
I suggest changing the spacewalks from TBA to Feburary 28 at 6:00 am EST for the first one and the second one from TBA to March 5 at 7:00 am EST. I found this on https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/schedule.html. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eth132489 ( talk • contribs) 19:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
OkayKenji You very welcome, reply to this page if you need anything else. Can somebody update the spacewalk list with actual time for March 5th. Also please add another spacewalk for Saturday March 13th. Here is the link https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/schedule.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eth132489 ( talk • contribs) 05:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Once again there is a need to update the EVA table - this time with the details of the EVA on 25 June 2031. AmigaClone ( talk) 23:06, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
When Shenzhou 12 reaches orbit, it will mark the first time that an American, a Chinese, and a Russian/Soviet crewed spacecraft will be in orbit at the same time. There was a bit of research there (comparing the dates of crewed Shenzhou mission with the last Space Shuttle missions). AmigaClone ( talk) 01:58, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
With the addition of the LauncerOne label the chart started exceeding the page width, and since we should expect more and more launchers reaching an high enough launch pace to deserve a place in that chart this problem will only get worse in the future. Is there a way to reduce the label font size in order to make the chart less wide or, even better, should a different type of chart be considered for that data?-- Fm3dici97 ( talk) 07:54, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Should there be a comment in the Human Spaceflight section about changes that have been made to the ISS?:
AmigaClone ( talk) 12:26, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 07:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
SpaceNews reported that the Nebula-M small-lift launch vehicle made a VTVL successful launch and landing in August, 2021, and on 2 Aug, I added that as a source for the rocket in the article. Don't know why, but it was subsequently removed. I think this should be in the 2021 article somewhere, if other mentions of suborbital tests (such as Starship) are going to be mentioned in the article. Otherwise, we are just censoring Chinese rocket content from Wikipedia.
Here is that bit from the 2 Aug edit, with a good source citation:
Cheers. N2e ( talk) 16:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
References
Should there be mention that this year has set several records related to spaceflight? Some that I know of are
Another possible record:
AmigaClone ( talk) 00:52, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2021 in spaceflight's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "spacecom":
Reference named "iss":
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: unfit URL (
link)Reference named "JSR":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to
provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2021 in spaceflight's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "us-com":
Reference named "gunter-falcon9":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:55, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
I don’t understand why SLS and Orion test flights are under “lunar exploration” while Starliner’s test flight is under Human Spaceflight, and Starship test flights are under rocket innovation. All of these vessels are comparable and should be covered in the same section for consistency. Grey Wanderer ( talk) 21:10, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
"Houston, we have a problem."
We've hit Wikipedia's post expansion include size limit for templates.
This means templates near the bottom of the screen won't work any more.
If it gets much worse, references will start to fail.
I'm not sure what the best solution is, but if the page can be split at June 30th that should solve the problem. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 🎄 23:16, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
We could have tried to reduce the size first, that would have been far less impactful. But it's likely the page will only grow over time. What do we do with the introduction and stats? I would prefer to keep them yearly for consistency and to have more material. We could write them in one article and then transclude them in the other. Alternatively we can keep 2021 in spaceflight for text and stats and then have the launch lists separate. -- mfb ( talk) 21:55, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
I moved this page back to 2021 in spaceflight, created the new 2021 in spaceflight (January–June) with launches only and reduced 2021 in spaceflight (July–December) to launches. I don't see remaining reference errors or other obvious problems, but more eyes help. I merged deeps-space rendezvous and kept EVAs here as these lists don't get long. -- mfb ( talk) 10:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
I expect most users here to also watch the subpages, but anyway: There is a proposed move discussion for them. "2021 in spaceflight (January–June)" → "List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2021" and analogous for the second half. -- mfb ( talk) 02:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
I suggest changing the spacewalks from TBA to Feburary 28 at 6:00 am EST for the first one and the second one from TBA to March 5 at 7:00 am EST. I found this on https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/schedule.html. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eth132489 ( talk • contribs) 19:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
OkayKenji You very welcome, reply to this page if you need anything else. Can somebody update the spacewalk list with actual time for March 5th. Also please add another spacewalk for Saturday March 13th. Here is the link https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/schedule.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eth132489 ( talk • contribs) 05:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Once again there is a need to update the EVA table - this time with the details of the EVA on 25 June 2031. AmigaClone ( talk) 23:06, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
When Shenzhou 12 reaches orbit, it will mark the first time that an American, a Chinese, and a Russian/Soviet crewed spacecraft will be in orbit at the same time. There was a bit of research there (comparing the dates of crewed Shenzhou mission with the last Space Shuttle missions). AmigaClone ( talk) 01:58, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
With the addition of the LauncerOne label the chart started exceeding the page width, and since we should expect more and more launchers reaching an high enough launch pace to deserve a place in that chart this problem will only get worse in the future. Is there a way to reduce the label font size in order to make the chart less wide or, even better, should a different type of chart be considered for that data?-- Fm3dici97 ( talk) 07:54, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Should there be a comment in the Human Spaceflight section about changes that have been made to the ISS?:
AmigaClone ( talk) 12:26, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 07:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
SpaceNews reported that the Nebula-M small-lift launch vehicle made a VTVL successful launch and landing in August, 2021, and on 2 Aug, I added that as a source for the rocket in the article. Don't know why, but it was subsequently removed. I think this should be in the 2021 article somewhere, if other mentions of suborbital tests (such as Starship) are going to be mentioned in the article. Otherwise, we are just censoring Chinese rocket content from Wikipedia.
Here is that bit from the 2 Aug edit, with a good source citation:
Cheers. N2e ( talk) 16:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
References
Should there be mention that this year has set several records related to spaceflight? Some that I know of are
Another possible record:
AmigaClone ( talk) 00:52, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2021 in spaceflight's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "spacecom":
Reference named "iss":
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: unfit URL (
link)Reference named "JSR":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)