From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Coherency of Edits

The article states that it was the longest winning margin since the '08 British GP but yet someone deleted a statement on the 2008 British Grand Prixarticle saying it was "untrue". For coherency, should we delete that statement on this race as well? Thanks. BMB YT 500000 ( talk) 17:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC) reply

As it is WP:UNSOURCED and has been challenged, yes, it should. SSSB ( talk) 07:54, 29 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Post-race section is dispropotionally large

I feel that the post-race section is dispropotionally large and needs to be trimmed, or the other sections substantionally expanded. As shown by the section sizes template above, the post-race section currently sits at 8,186 bytes, more than two times longer than the next largest section (excluding classification tables) which is the lead. Whilst I understand that post-race analysis by pundits is encylopedic, this section needs to be brought into proportion with the rest of the article. SSSB ( talk) 09:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC) reply


Agreed. Lets see what we can do. BMB YT 500000 ( talk) 13:52, 2 October 2021 (UTC) reply

I've deleted some of the unnecessary pieces. Its still large, but its a start. BMB YT 500000 ( talk) 14:13, 2 October 2021 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Coherency of Edits

The article states that it was the longest winning margin since the '08 British GP but yet someone deleted a statement on the 2008 British Grand Prixarticle saying it was "untrue". For coherency, should we delete that statement on this race as well? Thanks. BMB YT 500000 ( talk) 17:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC) reply

As it is WP:UNSOURCED and has been challenged, yes, it should. SSSB ( talk) 07:54, 29 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Post-race section is dispropotionally large

I feel that the post-race section is dispropotionally large and needs to be trimmed, or the other sections substantionally expanded. As shown by the section sizes template above, the post-race section currently sits at 8,186 bytes, more than two times longer than the next largest section (excluding classification tables) which is the lead. Whilst I understand that post-race analysis by pundits is encylopedic, this section needs to be brought into proportion with the rest of the article. SSSB ( talk) 09:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC) reply


Agreed. Lets see what we can do. BMB YT 500000 ( talk) 13:52, 2 October 2021 (UTC) reply

I've deleted some of the unnecessary pieces. Its still large, but its a start. BMB YT 500000 ( talk) 14:13, 2 October 2021 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook