![]() | 2021 North Kosovo crisis has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 6, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2021 North Kosovo crisis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A fact from 2021 North Kosovo crisis appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 14 January 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To prevent a potential edit war: should this article be in the Protests in Serbia category? Dege31 ( talk) 14:17, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Slight disagree. I think making it part of that category will encourage uncordial editing on what is and is not Serbia. The protests are not towards the Serbian government, but towards the Kosovan government within Kosovo de-facto regions. Thus, I think it should be kept as is category wise. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 16:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Per WP:CAT the goal of the categories is to facilitate search and browsing. Nothing prevents us from putting it in both categories and probably it will help readers find it more easily. Per the same policy the categories should be uncontroversial, but any decision here would be somewhat controversial and I don't think we should remove categories altogether. Just an idea, maybe create a category for the protests in North Kosovo which would have two parent categories: protests in Serbia and protests in Kosovo? Alaexis ¿question? 20:17, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
I think I'll support the proposal of Alaexis ¿question? , after all. It's clear that this will be an issue with the article- a revert of such a nature happened a third time now, so I think it's better if it's at least moved off-article. Dege31 ( talk) 08:46, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Should 13th October clashes be also added as part of 2021 crisis?
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/10/13/kosovo-police-clash-with-ethnic-serbs-during-smuggling-raids
SRofSerbia (
talk)
18:27, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Eviolite ( talk · contribs) 02:45, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this one within the next few days.
eviolite
(talk)
02:45, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Though, actually, before I get to anything: @ Dege31: per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events) and given examples I believe the year should go to the start of the article title, so the article would be called "2021 North Kosovo crisis". What do you think? eviolite (talk) 02:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Images:
Sourcing:
Prose:
Generally some text could do with a copyedit, but I can that and go through some more minor things after this review.
@ Dege31:: Placing on hold, see above. eviolite (talk) 21:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Kavyansh.Singh (
talk)
12:48, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Dege31 ( talk). Nominated by ArsenalGhanaPartey ( talk) at 17:07, 6 January 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
@
ArsenalGhanaPartey: Interesting hook! Under "reviewed" is a link to
Template:Did you know nominations. Which nomination did you review exactly for your QPQ?
Some Dude From North Carolina (
talk) 01:25, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Some Dude From North Carolina (
talk)
01:26, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | 2021 North Kosovo crisis has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 6, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2021 North Kosovo crisis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A fact from 2021 North Kosovo crisis appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 14 January 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To prevent a potential edit war: should this article be in the Protests in Serbia category? Dege31 ( talk) 14:17, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Slight disagree. I think making it part of that category will encourage uncordial editing on what is and is not Serbia. The protests are not towards the Serbian government, but towards the Kosovan government within Kosovo de-facto regions. Thus, I think it should be kept as is category wise. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 16:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Per WP:CAT the goal of the categories is to facilitate search and browsing. Nothing prevents us from putting it in both categories and probably it will help readers find it more easily. Per the same policy the categories should be uncontroversial, but any decision here would be somewhat controversial and I don't think we should remove categories altogether. Just an idea, maybe create a category for the protests in North Kosovo which would have two parent categories: protests in Serbia and protests in Kosovo? Alaexis ¿question? 20:17, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
I think I'll support the proposal of Alaexis ¿question? , after all. It's clear that this will be an issue with the article- a revert of such a nature happened a third time now, so I think it's better if it's at least moved off-article. Dege31 ( talk) 08:46, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Should 13th October clashes be also added as part of 2021 crisis?
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/10/13/kosovo-police-clash-with-ethnic-serbs-during-smuggling-raids
SRofSerbia (
talk)
18:27, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Eviolite ( talk · contribs) 02:45, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this one within the next few days.
eviolite
(talk)
02:45, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Though, actually, before I get to anything: @ Dege31: per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events) and given examples I believe the year should go to the start of the article title, so the article would be called "2021 North Kosovo crisis". What do you think? eviolite (talk) 02:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Images:
Sourcing:
Prose:
Generally some text could do with a copyedit, but I can that and go through some more minor things after this review.
@ Dege31:: Placing on hold, see above. eviolite (talk) 21:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Kavyansh.Singh (
talk)
12:48, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Dege31 ( talk). Nominated by ArsenalGhanaPartey ( talk) at 17:07, 6 January 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
@
ArsenalGhanaPartey: Interesting hook! Under "reviewed" is a link to
Template:Did you know nominations. Which nomination did you review exactly for your QPQ?
Some Dude From North Carolina (
talk) 01:25, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Some Dude From North Carolina (
talk)
01:26, 7 January 2022 (UTC)