![]() | 2019 South Bend mayoral election has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 27, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2019 South Bend mayoral election article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hog Farm ( talk · contribs) 16:23, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
1. Well-written
2. Verifiable
3. Broad in coverage
4. Neutral Neutral prose, balanced coverage
5. Stable
6. Illustrated if possible
Since it's been a few days without changes, I'll go ahead and put this one on hold now. @ SecretName101:, if you disagree with my statements on the possible citations overkill, I'm willing to request for an uninvolved third party to comment on what they think about it. 01:55, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
I guess I somewhat disagree with the citations overkill being much of a problem. SecretName101 ( talk) 04:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Note to second opinion The only disagreement with the article is whether some statements within it are overcited or not. Hog Farm ( talk) 05:27, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 04:06, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
@ SecretName101: Hi SecretName101, I've been mulling over the 2023 Carmel mayoral election deletion discussion and I think the results from it are extremely relevant for this article as well. It was established in that deletion discussion that local, routine election coverage for mayoral elections does not meet EVENTCRIT and that there must be national coverage highlighting the impact of the race (because local, routine coverage does not meet the standards for inclusion here). I think most of the South Bend mayoral articles that exist meet this criterion because of widespread coverage of Buttigieg's candidacy, but I think that this one is basically limited to Indiana sources and doesn't have a wider impact (I think as an ATD it could easily be redirected to Mayoral elections in South Bend, Indiana).
This, however, is a GA and I think it'd be super unseemly to just nominate it out of the blue. Before I throw it to AfD, is there coverage that would meet the precedent that we've set in that AfD (showing national coverage or impact outside of regular coverage)? Nomader ( talk) 16:54, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | 2019 South Bend mayoral election has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 27, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2019 South Bend mayoral election article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hog Farm ( talk · contribs) 16:23, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
1. Well-written
2. Verifiable
3. Broad in coverage
4. Neutral Neutral prose, balanced coverage
5. Stable
6. Illustrated if possible
Since it's been a few days without changes, I'll go ahead and put this one on hold now. @ SecretName101:, if you disagree with my statements on the possible citations overkill, I'm willing to request for an uninvolved third party to comment on what they think about it. 01:55, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
I guess I somewhat disagree with the citations overkill being much of a problem. SecretName101 ( talk) 04:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Note to second opinion The only disagreement with the article is whether some statements within it are overcited or not. Hog Farm ( talk) 05:27, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 04:06, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
@ SecretName101: Hi SecretName101, I've been mulling over the 2023 Carmel mayoral election deletion discussion and I think the results from it are extremely relevant for this article as well. It was established in that deletion discussion that local, routine election coverage for mayoral elections does not meet EVENTCRIT and that there must be national coverage highlighting the impact of the race (because local, routine coverage does not meet the standards for inclusion here). I think most of the South Bend mayoral articles that exist meet this criterion because of widespread coverage of Buttigieg's candidacy, but I think that this one is basically limited to Indiana sources and doesn't have a wider impact (I think as an ATD it could easily be redirected to Mayoral elections in South Bend, Indiana).
This, however, is a GA and I think it'd be super unseemly to just nominate it out of the blue. Before I throw it to AfD, is there coverage that would meet the precedent that we've set in that AfD (showing national coverage or impact outside of regular coverage)? Nomader ( talk) 16:54, 26 April 2023 (UTC)