This article was nominated for deletion on 7 July 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move – and other suggestions such as merge may be worth further consideration. ( non-admin closure) — Dicklyon ( talk) 15:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Further, WP:CRITERIA:"For articles on air accidents without a flight number, the title should be in the format <<year>> <<airline>> <<aircraft>> <<event>> or if this is not possible, <<year>> <<place>> <<event>>. [...] Some flexibility can be exercised. [...] Exceptions: if the event has acquired a popular name, that name should be used."
Recognizability – The title is a name or description of the subject that someone familiar with, although not necessarily an expert in, the subject area will recognize.
I would argue "Aero Teknic" is not really useful as an airline designation (the fr article calls it an aviation school) nor recognizable. For all those reasons we should move the article to be designated by the place. Bert Macklin ( talk) 21:49, 14 April 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. George Ho ( talk) 00:06, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
This article was nominated for merging with Jean Lapierre on 2016-04-30. The result of the discussion was merge with Mitsubishi MU-2 § Incidents and accidents. |
Why was this article merged? This is a very notable incident that deserves an article. When 7 people die in a plane crash, regardless of the place, an article is frequently made. When the plane crash occurs somewhere where plane crashes rarely occur, such as Canada, it also frequently gets an article. When a plane crash kills a former Canadian federal minister and MP, and radio host, that also adds on to the notability. I don't understand why this major incident was removed? There are many articles on aviation accidents that are a lot less notable than this one. An article this notable needs a article, and I would like to revert the merging.
Note: The original article appears to not have had much information, so was that the reason of the merging? I would have gladly improved the article, and I will if the merging is reverted. Beejsterb ( talk) 23:34, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 7 July 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move – and other suggestions such as merge may be worth further consideration. ( non-admin closure) — Dicklyon ( talk) 15:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Further, WP:CRITERIA:"For articles on air accidents without a flight number, the title should be in the format <<year>> <<airline>> <<aircraft>> <<event>> or if this is not possible, <<year>> <<place>> <<event>>. [...] Some flexibility can be exercised. [...] Exceptions: if the event has acquired a popular name, that name should be used."
Recognizability – The title is a name or description of the subject that someone familiar with, although not necessarily an expert in, the subject area will recognize.
I would argue "Aero Teknic" is not really useful as an airline designation (the fr article calls it an aviation school) nor recognizable. For all those reasons we should move the article to be designated by the place. Bert Macklin ( talk) 21:49, 14 April 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. George Ho ( talk) 00:06, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
This article was nominated for merging with Jean Lapierre on 2016-04-30. The result of the discussion was merge with Mitsubishi MU-2 § Incidents and accidents. |
Why was this article merged? This is a very notable incident that deserves an article. When 7 people die in a plane crash, regardless of the place, an article is frequently made. When the plane crash occurs somewhere where plane crashes rarely occur, such as Canada, it also frequently gets an article. When a plane crash kills a former Canadian federal minister and MP, and radio host, that also adds on to the notability. I don't understand why this major incident was removed? There are many articles on aviation accidents that are a lot less notable than this one. An article this notable needs a article, and I would like to revert the merging.
Note: The original article appears to not have had much information, so was that the reason of the merging? I would have gladly improved the article, and I will if the merging is reverted. Beejsterb ( talk) 23:34, 12 June 2016 (UTC)