![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | 2015 WTA Finals – Day-by-day summaries was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 November 2015 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into 2015 WTA Finals. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please do not do the semi-protected that all users can edit it. 111.250.63.194 ( talk) 09:44, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Why the TBD? WTA schedule does have the dates: "OCT 25 - NOV 01", it reads. Though it's possible those were added just today... 212.50.203.198 ( talk) 18:59, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Is this random or what? Why is #26 the magical cutoff? From my understranding the Zhuai Cup is 11 players from #9-19 and 1 wildcard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.218.136.96 ( talk) 00:00, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Ok so as of March 17, someone put the cut off at #25. We should establish a rank. That way the page is not subjective to include our favorite players ( I noticed Bouchard was #26, It doesn't matter whos #26 or whatever, it should include a set number, either 25 or 30. Personally #25 makes most sense. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
108.218.136.96 (
talk)
21:58, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, all! The reason I chose to include #26 is because whoever was at #25 became one spot lower due to another player's results. But because both were still active at the same time, it made sense to just leave it until everyone's results leave just the top 25 again. It had nothing to do with picking favorites (Bouchard is far from my favorite player). This way we don't have to continually edit it and re-research all the information every time #26 wins a match and re-enters the top 25. This is also why I had the cutoff for the table be #25, because if it was just the top 20, then we'd be editing it nonstop and it would become increasingly painful as the calendar rolls on. Another solution is to have #26-#30 hidden and then swap it out for whoever when their results change, or even #21-#30, only I don't know how to make a table fit within the <! tags. GAThrawnIGF ( talk) 22:59, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
{{#if:|deactivated content}}
. This dumb looking code says: If an empty string is non-empty then display deactivated content
.
PrimeHunter (
talk)
23:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)xxxxx
is the unwanted rows then simply write this around them:{{#if:|<!--Deactivated rows. May be activated later with updated results if the players advance. --> xxxxx }}
Why do the points under "total points" not match with the sum of the points in the tournaments?-- Intimidator ( talk) 08:56, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Rank | Athlete | Grand Slam tournament | Premier Mandatory | Best Premier 5 | Best other | Total points | Tours | Titles | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUS | FRA | WIM | USO | INW | MIA | MAD | BEI | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |||||
25 |
![]() |
R64 70 |
R32 130 |
R32 130 |
QF 430 |
R128 10 |
R32 65 |
Q2 2 |
R32 60 |
R32 60 |
SF 185 |
F 180 |
SF 110 |
F 95 |
QF 60 |
QF 60 |
1755 | 25 | 0 |
Agnieska Radwanska has a 0-pointer from Rome that has to be counted in her ranking as one of her 16 tournaments. 2.110.116.187 ( talk) 15:18, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Please see Talk:2015 WTA Elite Trophy. Any comments on this, please? Naki ( talk) 20:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2015 WTA Finals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:18, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | 2015 WTA Finals – Day-by-day summaries was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 November 2015 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into 2015 WTA Finals. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please do not do the semi-protected that all users can edit it. 111.250.63.194 ( talk) 09:44, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Why the TBD? WTA schedule does have the dates: "OCT 25 - NOV 01", it reads. Though it's possible those were added just today... 212.50.203.198 ( talk) 18:59, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Is this random or what? Why is #26 the magical cutoff? From my understranding the Zhuai Cup is 11 players from #9-19 and 1 wildcard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.218.136.96 ( talk) 00:00, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Ok so as of March 17, someone put the cut off at #25. We should establish a rank. That way the page is not subjective to include our favorite players ( I noticed Bouchard was #26, It doesn't matter whos #26 or whatever, it should include a set number, either 25 or 30. Personally #25 makes most sense. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
108.218.136.96 (
talk)
21:58, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, all! The reason I chose to include #26 is because whoever was at #25 became one spot lower due to another player's results. But because both were still active at the same time, it made sense to just leave it until everyone's results leave just the top 25 again. It had nothing to do with picking favorites (Bouchard is far from my favorite player). This way we don't have to continually edit it and re-research all the information every time #26 wins a match and re-enters the top 25. This is also why I had the cutoff for the table be #25, because if it was just the top 20, then we'd be editing it nonstop and it would become increasingly painful as the calendar rolls on. Another solution is to have #26-#30 hidden and then swap it out for whoever when their results change, or even #21-#30, only I don't know how to make a table fit within the <! tags. GAThrawnIGF ( talk) 22:59, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
{{#if:|deactivated content}}
. This dumb looking code says: If an empty string is non-empty then display deactivated content
.
PrimeHunter (
talk)
23:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)xxxxx
is the unwanted rows then simply write this around them:{{#if:|<!--Deactivated rows. May be activated later with updated results if the players advance. --> xxxxx }}
Why do the points under "total points" not match with the sum of the points in the tournaments?-- Intimidator ( talk) 08:56, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Rank | Athlete | Grand Slam tournament | Premier Mandatory | Best Premier 5 | Best other | Total points | Tours | Titles | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUS | FRA | WIM | USO | INW | MIA | MAD | BEI | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |||||
25 |
![]() |
R64 70 |
R32 130 |
R32 130 |
QF 430 |
R128 10 |
R32 65 |
Q2 2 |
R32 60 |
R32 60 |
SF 185 |
F 180 |
SF 110 |
F 95 |
QF 60 |
QF 60 |
1755 | 25 | 0 |
Agnieska Radwanska has a 0-pointer from Rome that has to be counted in her ranking as one of her 16 tournaments. 2.110.116.187 ( talk) 15:18, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Please see Talk:2015 WTA Elite Trophy. Any comments on this, please? Naki ( talk) 20:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2015 WTA Finals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:18, 21 October 2017 (UTC)