A fact from 2015 Russian submarine wreck discovery appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 August 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the submarine wreck found off the Swedish east coast in July 2015 was most likely the
RussianSom that sank in 1916?
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all
Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
join the project, or contribute to the
project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Well
Lappspira, every article should have a word or words in the
lead in bold to define the article. If the word combo that
you just removed is not satisfactory, what do you suggest we use instead? And which part of the
WP:MOS do you base the removal of the bold on? Cheers,
w.carter-Talk09:40, 30 July 2015 (UTC)reply
1 "If the article's title does not lend itself to being used easily and naturally in the opening sentence, the wording should not be distorted in an effort to include it :[in the lead]"
2 "Instead, simply describe the subject in normal English, avoiding redundancy"
3 "In general, if the article's title is absent from the first sentence, do not apply the bold style to related text that does appear*
A fact from 2015 Russian submarine wreck discovery appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 August 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the submarine wreck found off the Swedish east coast in July 2015 was most likely the
RussianSom that sank in 1916?
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all
Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
join the project, or contribute to the
project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Well
Lappspira, every article should have a word or words in the
lead in bold to define the article. If the word combo that
you just removed is not satisfactory, what do you suggest we use instead? And which part of the
WP:MOS do you base the removal of the bold on? Cheers,
w.carter-Talk09:40, 30 July 2015 (UTC)reply
1 "If the article's title does not lend itself to being used easily and naturally in the opening sentence, the wording should not be distorted in an effort to include it :[in the lead]"
2 "Instead, simply describe the subject in normal English, avoiding redundancy"
3 "In general, if the article's title is absent from the first sentence, do not apply the bold style to related text that does appear*