The "Entry" section is a bit confusing. If the top 20 teams were invited, why weren't they all there? (Presumably they declined their invitations?) "Of that list" is also confusing – "Of those teams" would be clearer.
I agree with the first half, but I've not found any sources that specify exactly why they weren't there. With it being in the US, and most teams being based in Europe, I assume it was a cost-based decision, and they simply chose to skip it, but as I say, I don't really know. Changed the second point as suggested.
Harriastalk11:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)reply
"totalling a race length" – I suggest "giving a total race length" would be nicer English.
Thanks for the review. My daughter has been ill, so I'm waaaaaay behind on anything "non-essential", so it might take me a bit longer than usual to get back to this.
Harriastalk16:59, 15 January 2016 (UTC)reply
The "Entry" section is a bit confusing. If the top 20 teams were invited, why weren't they all there? (Presumably they declined their invitations?) "Of that list" is also confusing – "Of those teams" would be clearer.
I agree with the first half, but I've not found any sources that specify exactly why they weren't there. With it being in the US, and most teams being based in Europe, I assume it was a cost-based decision, and they simply chose to skip it, but as I say, I don't really know. Changed the second point as suggested.
Harriastalk11:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)reply
"totalling a race length" – I suggest "giving a total race length" would be nicer English.
Thanks for the review. My daughter has been ill, so I'm waaaaaay behind on anything "non-essential", so it might take me a bit longer than usual to get back to this.
Harriastalk16:59, 15 January 2016 (UTC)reply