![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
>> Twitter ban sparks outrage in Turkey >> Turkish riot police quash protests near Ankara election commission >> Erdogan Foes Cry Fraud Amid Crackdown ( Lihaas ( talk) 17:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)).
A user, a single purpose account, has added whole new sections without any references. Other than being WP:OR the edits are marred with lack of neutrality with words like "police brutality". I am going to remove those parts. If they come back with sources and a less pointed language I guess there will not be a problem to accept those edits. If this user is a newcomer, I recommend it to read WP policies and guidelines, beginning with WP:NPOV. -- Why should I have a User Name? ( talk) 18:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I completely take your point. Rather than remove, perhaps it would be more useful for you to "neutralise" these terms? I don't know, for example "alleged police brutality" or "questionable police conduct" or similar? I think it would be more effective to change these controversial terms rather than remove them completely. I have also tried to make the article more neutral in that I have also added allegations of fraud from the ruling party itself, and I will reiterate this point further if it has not been made clear. What I would also say is that the results of these elections are not at all clear at the moment, since several re-counts are taking place and already large amounts of municipalities have changed mayors as a result. Obviously, when the results are finalised, the actual results and proper information about the elections itself will no doubt be added. Can I also ask what your view would be to returning the "election campaign" and "party aims" sections, but with references to each point? I didn't add them earlier (admittedly I was preoccupied with something else), but say if I found the resources which confirmed each aim of each party, would that be fine? T.C. Ataturkiye ( talk) 19:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
YSK has not yet released the results of the election. I think we should wait till then to enter the results. So far the numbers are taken either from Cihan Haber Ajansı or Anadolu Ajansı—where both have conflicting results. -- Infestor T• C 16:35, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
>> Twitter ban sparks outrage in Turkey >> Turkish riot police quash protests near Ankara election commission >> Erdogan Foes Cry Fraud Amid Crackdown ( Lihaas ( talk) 17:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)).
A user, a single purpose account, has added whole new sections without any references. Other than being WP:OR the edits are marred with lack of neutrality with words like "police brutality". I am going to remove those parts. If they come back with sources and a less pointed language I guess there will not be a problem to accept those edits. If this user is a newcomer, I recommend it to read WP policies and guidelines, beginning with WP:NPOV. -- Why should I have a User Name? ( talk) 18:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I completely take your point. Rather than remove, perhaps it would be more useful for you to "neutralise" these terms? I don't know, for example "alleged police brutality" or "questionable police conduct" or similar? I think it would be more effective to change these controversial terms rather than remove them completely. I have also tried to make the article more neutral in that I have also added allegations of fraud from the ruling party itself, and I will reiterate this point further if it has not been made clear. What I would also say is that the results of these elections are not at all clear at the moment, since several re-counts are taking place and already large amounts of municipalities have changed mayors as a result. Obviously, when the results are finalised, the actual results and proper information about the elections itself will no doubt be added. Can I also ask what your view would be to returning the "election campaign" and "party aims" sections, but with references to each point? I didn't add them earlier (admittedly I was preoccupied with something else), but say if I found the resources which confirmed each aim of each party, would that be fine? T.C. Ataturkiye ( talk) 19:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
YSK has not yet released the results of the election. I think we should wait till then to enter the results. So far the numbers are taken either from Cihan Haber Ajansı or Anadolu Ajansı—where both have conflicting results. -- Infestor T• C 16:35, 4 April 2014 (UTC)