This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Austria Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles European Union This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

My Changes are regarding the changes on 8 March 2014‎ from User:RJFF [1] From my perspective in the infobox election only parties are mentioned which already have gained a seat and also will contest again. So these are SPÖ, ÖVP, Martin's List, FPÖ, Greens and The Reform Conservatives REKOS. Further you can't argue why a party with no seat in the european parliament should be favoured to one that already has. However in my opinion we should wait until 11th April 2014 ( Referenced here) on that day the candidates that run for election will be finally fixated. It might happen that Martin's List doesn't even candidate a third time. -- Ukrainskij254 ( talk) 06:38, 9 March 2014 (UTC) reply

I assume RJFF is unwilling to talk. -- Ukrainskij254 ( talk) 17:48, 13 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I think the infobox should include ALL 9 parties that OFFICIALLY QUALIFIED for the ballot. Why should there be a difference between those who are in the EP right now and those who are not - when they in fact qualified like the "established" parties as well ? Besides, 9 parties in the infobox doesn't make the page "blown up" or anything and is still very much readable. Also, Europa Anders now has a decent chance to enter the EP (they are currently at 3% - with an upward trend, so the argument "they have no chance to be elected to the EP" does not matter really. The Pollster ( talk) 07:12, 5 May 2014 (UTC) reply

I agree and like the new info box very much. Regardless of which of this 9 parties is successfull, we already can react on the elections results on 25th May 2014 and don't have to chance the entire article. Thank you! -- Ukrainskij254 ( talk) 00:41, 7 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Exactly ! :-) The next thing I'll do is to include a blank results section, so we can enter the results when they come in on May 25. Also: Ukrainskij254, do you have any pictures from Angelika Werthmann and Robert Marschall, so we can complete the infobox with these 2 missing pictures ? Thanks. The Pollster ( talk) 06:26, 7 May 2014 (UTC) reply