A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on December 17, 2015. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please note that there is no proved evidence other than the allegations of three prosecutors who happen to be the same prosecutors not being able to find the terrorist network behind Hrant Dink Murder of 19 January 2007. The prosecutors are known for their adherence to the Gulen's movement which brings about suspicion whether the alleged case was fabricated in an act of retribution for the closure of Gulen's religiously affiliated schools.
This article is biased for it title, there is no hearings, no verdict but allegations. Alien sojourner ( talk) 16:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
I think this article is very sided. The whole operation is commited by police officers and judges from Gulen's movement. It is more like a Gulen's Coup Try, rather than a corruption scandal. Maybe you watch too much daily media, if you want to open your eyes and see the world as it is check out boilingfrogspost.com. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ykomut ( talk • contribs) 14:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
>> Turkey Scandal Places Jailed Millionaire at Center of Gold Trail >> Turkish judge probes PM 'cash stash' calls >> Turkish court frees key corruption suspects( Lihaas ( talk) 19:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)).
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
2013 corruption scandal in Turkey. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:48, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on December 17, 2015. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please note that there is no proved evidence other than the allegations of three prosecutors who happen to be the same prosecutors not being able to find the terrorist network behind Hrant Dink Murder of 19 January 2007. The prosecutors are known for their adherence to the Gulen's movement which brings about suspicion whether the alleged case was fabricated in an act of retribution for the closure of Gulen's religiously affiliated schools.
This article is biased for it title, there is no hearings, no verdict but allegations. Alien sojourner ( talk) 16:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
I think this article is very sided. The whole operation is commited by police officers and judges from Gulen's movement. It is more like a Gulen's Coup Try, rather than a corruption scandal. Maybe you watch too much daily media, if you want to open your eyes and see the world as it is check out boilingfrogspost.com. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ykomut ( talk • contribs) 14:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
>> Turkey Scandal Places Jailed Millionaire at Center of Gold Trail >> Turkish judge probes PM 'cash stash' calls >> Turkish court frees key corruption suspects( Lihaas ( talk) 19:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)).
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
2013 corruption scandal in Turkey. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:48, 26 February 2016 (UTC)