This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Central Asia Low‑importance 2013 Tajik presidential election is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles Tajikistan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tajikistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tajikistan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TajikistanWikipedia:WikiProject TajikistanTemplate:WikiProject TajikistanTajikistan articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Need to add an Opinion Polls section as soon as possible with reliable poll data. SharpsilveResearch ( talk) 21:47, 17 October 2013 (UTC) reply

While campaign could be fine, since its just one event in the section of the campaign cant we be more focused to the fact of a boycott (if there were more issues, then that's fine). Conduct is fair again but as there is nothing about the issues of the candidates specifically and only foreign based monitors why cant we seek SOME agreement and keep that ttile?( Lihaas ( talk) 17:25, 6 November 2013 (UTC)). reply

I was hoping that the sections would be expanded by more at a later date. There is generally more information about the conduct after the elections, so I would certainly expect more information to become available.

I think the most important thing is that we have a consistent set of headings for election articles. These tend to be Background, Electoral System, Candidates, Campaign, Opinion polls, Conduct, Results, Aftermath; hence the changes here. Number 5 7 17:28, 6 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Generally agree but one size doesn't fit all. What if that update doesn't come and it rarely does after election. Maybe that until update?( Lihaas ( talk) 00:47, 7 November 2013 (UTC)). reply

The start of the article states that he won 86.9%, while the infobox and results section states 83.9%. Which one is correct? 211.36.144.236 ( talk) 07:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC) reply