A news item involving 2013 Reyhanlı car bombings was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 11 May 2013. |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of May 2013 Reyhanli bombing was copied or moved into 2013 Reyhanlı bombings with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article 2013 Reyhanlı car bombings, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
It is requested that a map or maps be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in Turkey or Syria may be able to help! |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 11, 2019. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Çelik did not deny the leak, but stated that its content is unrelated.
Source: http://www.aksam.com.tr/siyaset/celikten-redhack-ve-reyhanli-belgesi-aciklamasi-1-er-gozaltinda/haber-208880 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.219.169.91 ( talk) 18:18, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
May 2013 Reyhanli bombing has just been merged by myself. There was an edit-conflict during the procedure but there seem to be no significant issue, feel free to fix otherwise. Greyshark09 ( talk) 18:35, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
As of May 11th, 2013, 21:05 UTC, there is no mention at all on any of the news sources that the perpetrator is the Kurdistan Workers' Party, yet the infobox listed them as the perpetrator. Unless there is a definite source of this, I'm removing the info from the box. EDIT: Whoops, apparently someone already removed it before I managed to do the edit. 77.172.68.203 ( talk) 21:08, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
We always use the local naming of city names. "Reyhanlı" is the correct name for the title. Similar to articles of other cities such as Reyhanlı itself. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 22:04, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
There are 3 figures on number:
1. On May, 11, 2013, the attorney general of Reyhanli district claimed to ban any visual, vocal or written material about the bombings through any mainstream media including internet.
2. ‘46’ is officially declared by the government officials. And no one believes that this is accurate. Of course, no one is excited to hear more and more number but they (‘they’ are ordinary citizens!) just want to learn the facts; not any manipulated thing.
3. There can be many provocateurs in the scene. So they can also exaggerate the number to trigger any type of riot.
In this Wikipedia page, whoever writes down a new line, particularly on the number, I highly recommend them to crosscheck with several foreign news web sites, not only with the Turkish ones.
Regards, Toksoz ( talk) 22:26, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
As everybody can see from previous heading, there was a controversy over the death toll in Turkish media since the very first day after the blasts. That was one of the reasons for the media ban imposition. Cumhuriyet is perhaps the oldest newspaper in Turkey. The text I added into the "bombings" section is reliably sourced by referencing to the article/report by Mustafa Kemal Erdemol, who is a reporter from Cumhuriyet newspaper. I believe user user:Sayerslle does not have good command of wikipedia policies and guidelines. There is no obligation to refer to an english source while expanding an article about a subject which was a "non-english event". The source I referred to (Gerçek Gündem) is an internet news portal, quoting the whole report from Cumhuriyet by referring with the editor's and newspaper's name; so it's a kind of reliable secondary source (or third party). Now I am reverting back user:Sayerslle's removal/deletion by changing the source to Cumhuriyet ( http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/?hn=416566&kn=7&ka=4&kb=7). It's kind of tiresome to argue about the points, that are already clear. Logos5557 ( talk) 21:36, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Any reliable sources in Turkish, or not in English, are welcome as per Verifiability Logos5557 ( talk) 13:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
There you go. http://www.zaman.com.tr/politika_reyhanli-saldirisini-el-kaide-ustlendi-basbakandan-aciklama-bekliyoruz_2146140.html , http://www.mynet.com/haber/guncel/el-kaide-reyhanliyi-ustlendi-iddiasi-816721-1 KazekageTR ( talk) 20:12, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Its not about your opinion, there are lots of news sites say that ISIS claim responsibility. By the way mynet and zaman are popular news corps, Another one, http://www.aydinlikdaily.com/Al-Qaeda-Claims-Responsibility-for-Reyhanlı-790 KazekageTR ( talk) 23:05, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Reyhanlı bombings. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:36, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
A news item involving 2013 Reyhanlı car bombings was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 11 May 2013. |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of May 2013 Reyhanli bombing was copied or moved into 2013 Reyhanlı bombings with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article 2013 Reyhanlı car bombings, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
It is requested that a map or maps be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in Turkey or Syria may be able to help! |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 11, 2019. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Çelik did not deny the leak, but stated that its content is unrelated.
Source: http://www.aksam.com.tr/siyaset/celikten-redhack-ve-reyhanli-belgesi-aciklamasi-1-er-gozaltinda/haber-208880 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.219.169.91 ( talk) 18:18, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
May 2013 Reyhanli bombing has just been merged by myself. There was an edit-conflict during the procedure but there seem to be no significant issue, feel free to fix otherwise. Greyshark09 ( talk) 18:35, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
As of May 11th, 2013, 21:05 UTC, there is no mention at all on any of the news sources that the perpetrator is the Kurdistan Workers' Party, yet the infobox listed them as the perpetrator. Unless there is a definite source of this, I'm removing the info from the box. EDIT: Whoops, apparently someone already removed it before I managed to do the edit. 77.172.68.203 ( talk) 21:08, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
We always use the local naming of city names. "Reyhanlı" is the correct name for the title. Similar to articles of other cities such as Reyhanlı itself. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 22:04, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
There are 3 figures on number:
1. On May, 11, 2013, the attorney general of Reyhanli district claimed to ban any visual, vocal or written material about the bombings through any mainstream media including internet.
2. ‘46’ is officially declared by the government officials. And no one believes that this is accurate. Of course, no one is excited to hear more and more number but they (‘they’ are ordinary citizens!) just want to learn the facts; not any manipulated thing.
3. There can be many provocateurs in the scene. So they can also exaggerate the number to trigger any type of riot.
In this Wikipedia page, whoever writes down a new line, particularly on the number, I highly recommend them to crosscheck with several foreign news web sites, not only with the Turkish ones.
Regards, Toksoz ( talk) 22:26, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
As everybody can see from previous heading, there was a controversy over the death toll in Turkish media since the very first day after the blasts. That was one of the reasons for the media ban imposition. Cumhuriyet is perhaps the oldest newspaper in Turkey. The text I added into the "bombings" section is reliably sourced by referencing to the article/report by Mustafa Kemal Erdemol, who is a reporter from Cumhuriyet newspaper. I believe user user:Sayerslle does not have good command of wikipedia policies and guidelines. There is no obligation to refer to an english source while expanding an article about a subject which was a "non-english event". The source I referred to (Gerçek Gündem) is an internet news portal, quoting the whole report from Cumhuriyet by referring with the editor's and newspaper's name; so it's a kind of reliable secondary source (or third party). Now I am reverting back user:Sayerslle's removal/deletion by changing the source to Cumhuriyet ( http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/?hn=416566&kn=7&ka=4&kb=7). It's kind of tiresome to argue about the points, that are already clear. Logos5557 ( talk) 21:36, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Any reliable sources in Turkish, or not in English, are welcome as per Verifiability Logos5557 ( talk) 13:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
There you go. http://www.zaman.com.tr/politika_reyhanli-saldirisini-el-kaide-ustlendi-basbakandan-aciklama-bekliyoruz_2146140.html , http://www.mynet.com/haber/guncel/el-kaide-reyhanliyi-ustlendi-iddiasi-816721-1 KazekageTR ( talk) 20:12, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Its not about your opinion, there are lots of news sites say that ISIS claim responsibility. By the way mynet and zaman are popular news corps, Another one, http://www.aydinlikdaily.com/Al-Qaeda-Claims-Responsibility-for-Reyhanlı-790 KazekageTR ( talk) 23:05, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Reyhanlı bombings. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:36, 10 March 2016 (UTC)