From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Passing comment

@ A.A Prinon: Just a comment but there are a few things you can improve before the GA review.

  • 1. ESPN Cricinfo needs to be consistent, sometimes it is called Cricinfo and other times it is called ESPN Cricinfo.
  • 2. The tournament is not broad in its coverage according to the Good article criteria. You need a summary section, see here.
  • 3. The tables need to be cut down. At the moment there is to much info (you don't need the result in the team totals section).

That is just from a 5 minute look. If I were you I would delist the GA review request, fix these issues and then relist it. It is your choice though. Anyway good luck. CreativeNorth ( talk) 16:14, 28 April 2021 (UTC) reply

@ CreativeNorth: Thanks for suggestion. Will try to fix those and add some content. —  A.A Prinon  Conversation 09:39, 29 April 2021 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Passing comment

@ A.A Prinon: Just a comment but there are a few things you can improve before the GA review.

  • 1. ESPN Cricinfo needs to be consistent, sometimes it is called Cricinfo and other times it is called ESPN Cricinfo.
  • 2. The tournament is not broad in its coverage according to the Good article criteria. You need a summary section, see here.
  • 3. The tables need to be cut down. At the moment there is to much info (you don't need the result in the team totals section).

That is just from a 5 minute look. If I were you I would delist the GA review request, fix these issues and then relist it. It is your choice though. Anyway good luck. CreativeNorth ( talk) 16:14, 28 April 2021 (UTC) reply

@ CreativeNorth: Thanks for suggestion. Will try to fix those and add some content. —  A.A Prinon  Conversation 09:39, 29 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook